2025_12_11 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: DDD996A4-9AEB-4186-AE75-797CE2829130 • Square footage and year built is incorrect I have attached a copy of an estimated home value from my bank, State Employees' Credit Union. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • On November 19th,the subject property was visited by an appraiser. During this visit, the house was remeasured, and it was determined that it had been internally coded incorrectly as having a 50%finished second floor. Based on observations from the site visit and the attached photographs,the correct classification should be 50% finished attic space, and the effective year built should be adjusted to 1980. • A sales analysis for Neighborhood 7203 is attached, supporting the recommendation to correct the square footage and revise the effective year built.Although the comparable properties have greater square footage than the subject property,the neighborhood sales provided are more appropriate than selecting comparables of similar size located outside the neighborhood. This difference is evident in the land/lot values of the comparables used in the State Employees Credit Union report—e.g.,201 Alabama Ave. • Based on the information provided,the County recommends a new proposed value of $416,100. • Photos of Subject • Comparable Report • Sales Analysis Report 7203 • Current Property Record Card • Proposed Property Record Card Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $416,100 Made the motion Richal Vanhook Seconded the motion Saru Salvi Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner I Sam Barbee Hrs Appellant(if different) Property Address 1600 Nunn Street Parcel ID or Abstract 19788074485 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on development potential and perceived overvaluation of full-size Northside parcels. Current Assessed Value $165,000 ounty Opinion $110,000 Time of Hearin 9:35AM Appellant Opinion $60,000 County Representative Kelly Wells Board Decision $55,000 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • This lot has—1/3rd the normal Northside property's development potential. • Full-size lots in Northside were overvalued by the tax office by at least$75,000.