2025_12_10 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:84157092-C2DE-402A-AE92-3A9DOF65AA54 - Reduce the Effective Year Built to the actual year built of 1957 (previously 1972) - Change Condition from Average to Fair - Apply an additional 25%for physical depreciation - Reduce Grade from C-10 to D+5 • The subject's land value was also reviewed as part of a BOER-ordered neighborhood analysis performed by Tanner Valuation Group. As a result of that review, lot valuations in this neighborhood were reduced from $250,000 to $225,000, and this adjustment has been applied to the subject parcel. • County staff additionally reviewed a sales analysis of the comparable properties submitted by the appellant. After applying the recommended changes,the subject's value per square foot is significantly below that of the comparables, appropriately reflecting the dwelling's current condition relative to the condition of nearby sales. • After completing the review, County staff recommends a revised assessed value of$291,900 for the subject property. • Photos of Subject • GIS Map • Sales Analysis • Current Property Record Card • Proposed Property Record Card • Analysis Report Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $238,000 Made the motion Richal Vanhook Seconded the motion Leon Meyers Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner William Gattis Trustee A ellant if different Andrew Simpson Property Address 106 Guthrie Avenue Parcel ID or Abstract 19788041807 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on position that valuation exceeds fair market value, environmental constraints, condition, and a comparable sale. Current Assessed Value $260,000 ounty Opinion $153,000 Time of Hearin 2:19PM Appellant Opinion $130,000 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $96,800 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant contends that the current assessed value substantially exceeds the fair market value of the property as of January 1,2025. They assert that the valuation does not adequately reflect the property's significant environmental constraints, considerable deferred maintenance, or a proper market analysis. • The appellant provided 303 Knolls Street as a comparable sale, along with three additional equity comparables—two located off Dogwood Street and one at 530 Coolidge Street. • Hudson Vaughn was called as a witness and presented evidence on behalf of the appellant.