2025_12_10 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:2AE380D6-CCFA-4E2C-9964-9023855FBC51 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • No evidence submitted at this time. • Hudson Vaughn was called as a witness and presented evidence on behalf of the appellant. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is a 1,227-sf single family home with 3 bedrooms and 1 and 1/2 baths built in 1942 on an.14 acre lot in The Northside district in Chapel Hill. • This property's land was reduced during the BOER ordered neighborhood review. The land base rate was reduced from $250,000 to$220,000 and size adjustment added for smaller lots due to the Floor Area Ration restriction brining the parcel to the current total value of $282,700. • Tanner Valuations Group reviewed the property and the appeal and recommend removing the storage building no longer on the property, and reducing the effective age built to the actual age built 1942, from 1952 resulting in a reduction in value from$282,700 to$282,200. • Photo • GIS Map • Sales and Equity Analysis • Current Property Record Card • Proposed Property Record Card Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $266,800 Made the motion Leon Meyers Seconded the motion Barbara Levine Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Property Identification: Prove Provertv Owner Anita Booth A ellant if different Andrew Simpson Property Address 304 McDade Street I Parcel ID or Abstract 19788189128 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on position that valuation exceeds fair market value, development limitations, and condition. Current Assessed Value $250,600 ounty Opinion $239,000 Time of Hearin 11:27AM Appellant Opinion $171,000 County Representative Kelly Wells Board Decision $206,000 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • We respectfully submit that the current valuation significantly exceeds the fair market value of the property as of January 1,2025, and fails to account for severe development limitations and substantial condition deficiencies. • Hudson Vaughn was called as a witness and presented evidence on behalf of the appellant. Evidence submitted by the county representative: