2025_12_09 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: 167B6114-F2FE-40FE-B240-9F96B7861224 Voted For I All BOER Members Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner Maury D. Klein Appellant(if different) Property Address 510 Quinn Court I Parcel ID or Abstract 19769497169 Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the condition of home,yard item value, and comparable properties. Current Assessed Value $814,900 ounty Opinion $739,700 Time of Hearin 2:36PM Appellant Opinion $586,800 County Representative Bill Hiltbold Board Decision $739,700 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The three main items affecting the valuation are Building and Land. >BUILDING should be valued with 3,578 sf at$135/sf for a total of$483,030. The home was built in 1988 with an addition in 1996 and is pretty dated with a very unorthodox floor plan. Therefore, much of the "livable" square footage is not easily accessible/usable. The homes of my two neighbors who have also lived here since the 1990's [511 &505 Quinn Court] are valued at$143/square foot & $142/square foot respectively,but those homes have much more orthodox floor plans. Therefore, $135/square foot is a more appropriate number to use to value my home. • STORAGE BUILDING--there is a small [10'x10'] storage building on the garage side of the house which is valued at$1,800. LAND VALUE --my 1.12 acres are valued at$275,000= $245,536/acre which is totally unrealistic. There are three plots on Creekstone Drive 75-100 yards from me which are valued at $52,700 to$65,800 per acre. I know these are much larger plots [5.38 to 7.4 acres],but that should not increase the valuation of my property by 360%to 486%. I also do not see any land parcels in Orange County close to $245,000 or even$150,000 per acre. I feel that a maximum land value for 510 Quinn Court is$100,000. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE WITH MY TOTAL VALUATION OF $586,800, I would appreciate an opportunity to address the board in person. Thank you very much--Maury Klein Evidence submitted by the county representative: • This single-family residence has low and sloped ceilings. The single-story portion has a finished attic but none of the ceilings are more than 7 feet above the floor. The second floor over the garage has a vaulted ceiling with the center portion above 7 feet. I calculate the living area for the entire house at 3,685,the same as an earlier fee appraisal. A small addition since calculates to a present area of 3,734 sf. • The neighborhood analysis lists the appellant presented comparisons (shown in blue)and the 3 qualified recent sales as more than 500 square feet smaller than the subject and 2 of them have a land discount for power lines. The subject is presently between the mean and median of total value and sale price per square foot of the close comparisons. • The county recommends changing the story height from 1 to 1.25, effective year built from 1990 to the year built of 1988 and adding a 10%functional depreciation for the low ceilings in the finished attic. If the Board accepts these adjustments the building value would decrease by $75,200 to $462,900 and total property value would decrease from$814,900 to $739,700.