Browse
Search
2025_12_09 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_12_09 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2025 2:28:02 PM
Creation date
12/31/2025 2:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID: 167B6114-F2FE-40FE-B240-9F96B7861224 <br /> Current Assessed Value $674,000 County Opinion $497,700 <br /> Time of Hearin 4:09PM Appellant Opinion $488,500 <br /> County Representative Scott Zeman Board Decision $497,700 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • Third-party appraisal to establish value backdated to 12/31/2024. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a 1-bedroom, 1.5-bathroom barn dominium-style residence located on <br /> 16 acres. It is 882 square feet of living space over a 2,107-square-foot unheated <br /> workshop/garage. <br /> • A county appraiser performed a site visit on 12/3/2025. The appellant was at home and allowed <br /> access to the exterior of the property for photos and verification of property characteristics. <br /> • Appraiser observations and recommendations: <br /> 1. GRADE: The residence has a grade of C+10. No change to grade is recommended. <br /> 2. AGE: The residence was built in 2015 and has an effective year built of 2015.No change <br /> to effective year built is recommended. <br /> 3. CONDITION: The residence is currently in Average condition.No change to condition <br /> is recommended. <br /> 4. YARD ITEMS: The current property record indicates a 12'x16' storage building which <br /> was not observed on the property during the site review. The structure should be <br /> removed, lowering the property value by$4,900. <br /> 5. LAND VALUE: Based on the third-party appraisal and county sales analysis below, a- <br /> 30%land value adjustment should be applied for topography. This would reduce the land <br /> value by$171,400. <br /> 6. SALES ANALYSIS AND THIRD-PARTY APPRAISAL: The third-party appraisal <br /> values the subject property at$488,500. The appraisal was completed on 9/18/2025 and <br /> retroactively dated to 12/31/2024.All comps used in the appraisal are qualified sales <br /> occurring in 2024. <br /> • The county performed an analysis of four sales of improved properties. The sales had a median <br /> price per square foot of$389. The county's proposal would set the value of the subject property <br /> at$564 per square foot. It should be noted that the comps are traditional residences with larger <br /> square footages than the subject. There is a lack of recent sales data for barn dominium-style <br /> residences with similar square footage and land sizes to the subject property. <br /> • The county also performed a land value analysis of recent vacant land sales. Four nearby <br /> properties sold at a median price per acre of$31,550. The county's proposal would set the <br /> subject's land value at $399,800, or$24,988 per acre. <br /> • The county recommends a value of$497,700 for the subject property. This value can be <br /> considered as a compromise between the price per square foot analysis and the price per acre <br /> analysis. <br /> • Photos of Subject <br /> • County improved property analysis <br /> • County unimproved property analysis <br /> • Third-party appraisal <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.