Browse
Search
2025_12_02 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_12_02 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2025 2:27:45 PM
Creation date
12/31/2025 2:23:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/2/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID: B280D705-EADF-4415-899E-F125316E835B <br /> on block. Any reasonable market participant would expect to be compensated or pay for the <br /> effort required to gain this approval and the time involved. <br /> • The appellant has provided a pieces and parts equity argument based on six comparable <br /> properties. Three of the comparables provided include allocated values of improved property, <br /> while two do not have zoning/entitlements consistent with those of the subject property. The <br /> remaining comparable is that of 19 Maxwell Rd,which is under the same master plan as the <br /> subject property and is assessed at a similar value. This poor equity argument is then combined <br /> with sales of the same properties,two of which occurred after the lien date(201 Village Centre <br /> Dr& 1708-1712 Legion Rd)and one of which(19 Maxwell Rd) appears to have been a related <br /> party transaction between companies owned by the owner of the subject property in question. <br /> • The result of a reconciliation of such inconsistent data cannot sustain a consistency argument <br /> such as that being presented by the appellant. Consequently,no adjustment can be supported. <br /> • GIS Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card (24 pages) <br /> • Comparable Sales Analysis <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Coun 's Proposed Value: $5,896,300 No change in value <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner CHI 54 LLC Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 100 Marriott Way Parcel ID or Abstract 9798730033 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on condition, parking location, and comparable <br /> property values. <br /> Current Assessed Value $19,223,100 ounty Opinion $19,233,100 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:51 PM Appellant Opinion $12,633,336 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $19,233,100 No change in value <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The property needs to be fully renovated to meet Marriott requirements but at this point has not <br /> been renovated due to lack of business caused by Covid and the disruptions at the Friday <br /> Center which provide a significant portion of the demand for this property. <br /> • The value placed on the property is inconsistent with other similarly situated hotels in Chapel <br /> Hill. The Marriott Aloft located at 1001 Hamilton Road,Chapel Hill,NC, which is much <br /> newer than the subject property is valued at$87,349 per room but somehow the subject <br /> property is valued at$113,807 per room. Similarly,the newly built Tru by Hilton located at <br /> 1742 Fordham Blvd is valued at $87,306 per room. Using the higher of these two numbers the <br /> Courtyard would be valued at$14,762,020. However, this value still overstates the value of the <br /> hotel because both the Aloft and Tru have all their parking in Orange County and the tax value <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.