Browse
Search
OUTBoard Dec 15, 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
OUTBoard Dec 15, 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2025 4:17:42 PM
Creation date
12/30/2025 4:17:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/15/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
47 completed engagements and was able to reach 600 residents across nine different engagement <br /> 48 platforms. They had a project website and an interactive online map, and an online survey. They <br /> 49 completed one pop-up and public workshops in Carrboro and Chapel Hill. Feedback from all platforms <br /> 50 indicated that the infrastructure is limited and disconnected. Although there was interest in creating <br /> 51 connections between Chapel Hill, Carrboro, and Hillsborough, safety concerns arose due to drivers' <br /> 52 behaviors. <br /> 53 <br /> 54 Stantec chose 10 project concept designs, eight of which came from the top 20 projects that came <br /> 55 from the prioritization criteria that they went through, along with a prioritization working group;the <br /> 56 last two projects came from engaging with the community.They determined the 10 by doing 10%of 10 <br /> 57 projects. It was highlighted that safety concerns near Duke Forest on Whitfield Road, noting the lack of <br /> 58 sidewalks and shoulders, despite increased bicycle and pedestrian activity. It was also mentioned that <br /> 59 the new 1-40 entrance has shifted traffic patterns in the northwest Chapel Hill/unincorporated area. It <br /> 60 was suggested that we discuss traffic, safety, and speed because there is an allusion to that earlier in <br /> 61 the plan.Any recommendations on roads like Old NC 86 or NC 86 would stop at the Hillsborough town <br /> 62 limits because this plan does not cover facilities inside the town. One OUTboard member suggested <br /> 63 that the document clearly note that some proposed segments will not connect directly to <br /> 64 Hillsborough's existing bike and pedestrian network, since the town has limited space(e.g., on Churton <br /> 65 Street), and the plan does not include their internal projects. Stantec said they discussed with <br /> 66 Hillsborough staff that their planned shared-use path on Churton Street would connect directly to the <br /> 67 shared-use path recommended in this plan. If the town chooses a different design,the connection <br /> 68 could shift from a shared-use path to a bike lane, but coordination between county and town staff will <br /> 69 ensure everything ties together.The OUTboard members would like to see more data, because right <br /> 70 now they don't have enough information. Stantec asked for feedback on how supportive the board <br /> 71 would be with recommendations to update the Unified Development Ordinance(UDO)to align with <br /> 72 current and future planning efforts. Yes, and UDO updates are already underway, and aligning them <br /> 73 with adopted plans would help ensure consistency, close network gaps, and require developers to <br /> 74 provide needed bicycle and pedestrian connections. It was suggested to use an example that supports <br /> 75 rural concepts. It was suggested that we use the type of facility that we want in the plan and have the <br /> 76 plan adopted as part of the county's plan. It was explained that Orange County has a strong foundation <br /> 77 of adopted plans that support biking and walking, such as the Orange County Transportation <br /> 78 Multimodal Plan, Orange County Trails plan,TWTPO Vision Action Zero Plan, and Safe Routes for <br /> 79 School Plan.The Bike-Ped plan is expected to go before the board in January or February, and we have <br /> 80 another meeting before presenting the packet to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). <br /> 81 <br /> 82 There were several questions: <br /> 83 0 Can we have a list of the roads?Yes,they will be provided <br /> 84 0 Is there a way to have a map with roads labeled online and in a spreadsheet? <br /> 85 0 Did you remove the greenway and trail?Yes, because Parks and Recreation are doing a separate <br /> 86 plan. Stantec is only focusing on the bike-ped network that's on the road. <br /> 87 0 When the plans are complete,will we be able to see how they are both connected?Yes,they are <br /> 88 being completed in a parallel process, and we are both prioritizing. Both plans will be presented <br /> 89 to the BOCC together so that they can see both plans at the same time. <br /> 90 0 What is Stantec proposing for Old 86?The right of way is so very narrow. Stantec recommends a <br /> 91 10-foot shared-use path along Old NC 86, separated from the roadway with a buffer, to improve <br /> 92 safety for people walking and biking,given curves, driver behavior, and line-of-sight issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.