2025_12_03 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: F6129COB-8F23-4F8D-BD35-5A65ECFOE8CA In the appeal,the appellant challenges the adjustments applied to the subject property. Specifically, the appellant disputes the reduction associated with the parcel's non-perking status. • County Analysis: Orange County has historically applied a standard—75%adjustment for non-perking land. While there is no substantial sales data pool to empirically support this exact percentage, the adjustment has been consistently used for many years. It is based on: Limited prior sales of non-perking tracts, Testimony and documentation from property owners regarding the cost of installing non- conventional septic systems, and Situations where no septic system can be installed at all. • Although the subject parcel currently carries an—80%adjustment,the County maintains that a —75%reduction is reasonable and appropriate for non-perking land. Such property is typically not without utility, nor is it without market value, but its usability and desirability are significantly diminished compared to standard perking parcels. • Recommendation: After reviewing the appellant's concerns and considering the County's established valuation practices, the County recommends no change to the current assessed value. • Aerial Photo • Current Property Record Card Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $39,800 Made the motion Barbara Levine Seconded the motion Shannon Julian Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against ... Consent Agenda: Motion of the Board Accept Proposed Consent Agenda?: Yes Made the motion Barbara Levine Seconded the motion Shannon Julian Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Notes: Please see the attached Consent Agenda list.