2025_12_03 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: F6129COB-8F23-4F8D-BD35-5A65ECFOE8CA Property Identification: Property Owner Jeff Erick Essen Appellant(if different) Property Address Lot 6, off Shadylawn Road Parcel ID or Abstract 9789890111 Extension Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the fact that the subject property is unbuildable and does not perc. Current Assessed Value $31,800 ounty Opinion $31,800 Time of Hearin 2:04PM Appellant Opinion $15,000 County Representative Jimmy Milliken Board Decision $31,800 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • Unusable raw land at the end of a dirt road in a poor,rural neighborhood of abandoned homes and mobile homes with no access to sewer. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is a 1.50 acre vacant lot off Shadylawn Road Extension in NBC 7421. The parcel is identified as a non-perking lot, and the assessment appropriately reflects this with an—85%adjustment,which also accounts for the existing dirt drive location and limited access. • Appellant's Argument: In the appeal,the appellant challenges the adjustments applied to the subject property. Specifically, the appellant disputes the reduction associated with the parcel's non-perking status. • County Analysis: Orange County has historically applied a standard—75%adjustment for non-perking land. While there is no substantial sales data pool to empirically support this exact percentage,the adjustment has been consistently used for many years. It is based on: Limited prior sales of non-perking tracts, Testimony and documentation from property owners regarding the cost of installing non- conventional septic systems, and Situations where no septic system can be installed at all. • Although the subject parcel currently carries an—85%adjustment,the County maintains that a —75%reduction is reasonable and appropriate for non-perking land. Such property is typically not without utility, nor is it without market value,but its usability and desirability are significantly diminished compared to standard perking parcels. • Recommendation: After reviewing the appellant's concerns and considering the County's established valuation practices, the County recommends no change to the current assessed value. • Aerial Photo • Current Property Record Card Motion of the Board Accept County's Proposed Value: $31,800 No Change in Value Made the motion Shannon Julian