Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Docusign Envelope ID:A5042F46-AF25-45CO-912B-AADOE81E2977 <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • A county appraiser met the appellant at the property for a site review on 10/29/2025. <br /> Photographs were taken by the appraiser. The appraiser observed locations where debris from <br /> the flooding had been caught in trees. The debris indicates that flood waters were 5 to 6 feet <br /> high in the lower areas of the property. <br /> • About 90%of the property appeared to have been flooded. The FEMA floodplain map shows <br /> about 75%of the property in the 100-year floodplain, but floodwaters reached beyond this <br /> extent. <br /> • There is also a steep gully running through the middle of the property beginning at the drainage <br /> pipe underneath Tilley Road. <br /> • Based on the appraiser observations,the property should be considered unsuitable for <br /> development. The property currently has a 50% downward adjustment for the floodplain. The <br /> county recommends the adjustment be revised to 75%. <br /> • With the adjustment,the property would be valued at$37,600. <br /> 1. Overhead image with 100-year floodplain <br /> 2. Appraiser photos <br /> 3. Current property record card <br /> 4. Proposed property record <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Coun 's Proposed Value: $37,600 <br /> Made the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members _ <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner I Harvey Charles Krasny Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 1 120 Woodbridge Lane Parcel ID or Abstract 9799386254 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on amount of increase, condition of house and <br /> land, and proximity to other properties and traffic areas. <br /> Current Assessed Value $297,900 County Opinion $233,800 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:24 PM Appellant Opinion $216,400 <br /> County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $233,800 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant states that there are several reasons for this appeal: <br /> - A disproportionate increase(77%) in the assessment <br /> - Lack of updates/upgrades and condition issues <br /> - Proximity to the Marriott Hotel <br />