Browse
Search
Agenda 12-09-2025; 8-a - Minutes for November 6, 2025 Business Meeting and November 11, 2025 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 12-09-2025; 8-a - Minutes for November 6, 2025 Business Meeting and November 11, 2025 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 3:13:38 PM
Creation date
12/4/2025 3:17:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for December 9, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
ORD-2025-038-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #4
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-039-North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-040-Award of bid for installation and replacement of booths at Solid Waste and recycling centers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-041-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-042-Transit scheduling and dispatch software agreement approval and approval of budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-107-Performance Agreement Between Orange County and Citel America
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
RES-2025-065-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-066-Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
29 <br /> 1 Orange County hotels and restaurants would benefit hosting soccer in the area. She asked if it <br /> 2 would it be open to users in Orange County. <br /> 3 Commissioner Greene said she wanted to honor the spirit of what the voters wanted to <br /> 4 see with the purchase of this property. She said it is important to be intentional about where <br /> 5 housing goes. She said for people making lower incomes, they need to be on transit lines and <br /> 6 near services. She said this property was not the best place for housing. <br /> 7 Commissioner McKee said he agreed with Commissioner Fowler that this was a win-win <br /> 8 for the county. He said that due to the slope on the back side of the property, they would not be <br /> 9 able to build a soccer complex there. He said that leaves options for the county to use the back <br /> 10 side for recreation or some other use. He said if they provide areas for housing, it needs to be on <br /> 11 a bus line. He had concerns about the appraisal price of the property and felt it was low. <br /> 12 Chair Bedford noted that this property did not have to be limited to soccer. She noted <br /> 13 some of the other sports that could be played there. She asked about including pickleball courts. <br /> 14 David Stancil agreed. He said that there are occasional lacrosse and ultimate frisbee <br /> 15 tournaments that could use the property, but most of the demand is for soccer. He said that a <br /> 16 pickleball court could be included if the land was identified. He said there isn't a limitation on the <br /> 17 types of activities. <br /> 18 Chair Bedford asked how many soccer fields could fit on the property. <br /> 19 David Stancil said six, with associated amenities like parking, concessions, and storm <br /> 20 water. <br /> 21 Chair Bedford asked how the bathrooms would work. <br /> 22 David Stancil said they would be on septic. He said there could be a high demand for <br /> 23 wastewater, and that would need to be considered. <br /> 24 Chair Bedford said she asked Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director for Long Range Planning, <br /> 25 about the responsibility for zoning in this area. She said that it is within the joint planning area. <br /> 26 She said that recreational facilities in the rural buffer require a special use permit, which is <br /> 27 reviewed by the Board of Adjustment per the joint planning agreement, and both Carrboro and <br /> 28 Chapel Hill would be invited to comment on the application. She said this is done at the staff <br /> 29 level. She said the Board of Adjustment would consider the towns' comments, but they are not <br /> 30 binding. She said it appears that the railroad line does not present a safety concern as it is on <br /> 31 the other side of the road. <br /> 32 Commissioner Carter asked if the community still desires a soccer facility. <br /> 33 David Stancil said they did not have data specifically on this property. He said that in the <br /> 34 Strategic Plan survey, one of the high-ranking criteria that people liked about the community is <br /> 35 the open space and parks. He said a survey done for the adopted parks and recreation master <br /> 36 plan, showed that soccer fields were still in high demand. He said he oversees the activities at <br /> 37 the Soccer.com complex, and based on his observations there, more soccer fields are needed in <br /> 38 the community. <br /> 39 Commissioner Carter asked if this property could be sold to a non-profit and conditions <br /> 40 attached to the property. <br /> 41 Chair Bedford said yes, distinguishing between a sale to a non-profit or government entity <br /> 42 versus a regular sale. <br /> 43 John Roberts said if it is transferred to a non-profit, then it must have conditions on it to <br /> 44 keep it in a public use. He said if the non-profit stops using it for the public purpose it was <br /> 45 designated for originally, then it reverts to Orange County ownership. He said if it is sold on the <br /> 46 open market, the county cannot put conditions on that sale. <br /> 47 Commissioner Carter pointed out that there are opportunities to have trails on the property <br /> 48 and consider other uses. <br /> 49 Commissioner Fowler asked if the county sells outright and there's already a conservation <br /> 50 easement, the new owner will have to abide by that after the sale. <br /> 51 John Roberts said yes, easements go with the land. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.