Browse
Search
Agenda 12-09-2025; 8-a - Minutes for November 6, 2025 Business Meeting and November 11, 2025 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 12-09-2025; 8-a - Minutes for November 6, 2025 Business Meeting and November 11, 2025 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 3:13:38 PM
Creation date
12/4/2025 3:17:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for December 9, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
ORD-2025-038-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #4
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-039-North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-040-Award of bid for installation and replacement of booths at Solid Waste and recycling centers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-041-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-042-Transit scheduling and dispatch software agreement approval and approval of budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-107-Performance Agreement Between Orange County and Citel America
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
RES-2025-065-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-066-Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> 1 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked why some activity nodes had not been developed and <br /> 2 if one of the reasons is that development requests have been denied. <br /> 3 Cy Stober said in the last three years, there have been four applications on activity nodes. <br /> 4 He said they included the Dollar General, the Family Dollar, the Fiddlehead project, and the 86 <br /> 5 North project. <br /> 6 Commissioner Portie-Ascott said she was told the property in the 86 North project had <br /> 7 been on the market 10 years, this was the fourth buyer, and all the other requests had been <br /> 8 denied. <br /> 9 Cy Stober said some of that were petitions to the town as well as the county. He said this <br /> 10 was the third time he'd seen a potential project on the property during his time at the county and <br /> 11 that the other two dropped out after talking through the potential challenges for development. He <br /> 12 said that there is another zoning application and if the party moves forward, it will come to the <br /> 13 Board for review in the spring. He said that would make five in 3 and a half years, and would be <br /> 14 for a commercial use. <br /> 15 Vice-Chair Hamilton asked what the population is in each activity node. She asked what <br /> 16 the creators were thinking about when they created the concept of the activity node. <br /> 17 Cy Stober said he did not know, and they didn't have any notes from the time they were <br /> 18 created, 45 years ago. <br /> 19 Vice-Chair Hamilton asked if those areas have become denser. <br /> 20 Cy Stober said they've seen more subdivisions on the 54 and 86 corridors, particularly <br /> 21 outside the rural buffer, but they don't have data on it. He said that in the northern part of the <br /> 22 county, there are soil issues which make it difficult to subdivide the land for residential purposes. <br /> 23 He said hasn't been developed for commercial purposes at this time. He said there are septic <br /> 24 issues in the northern part of the county due to soil suitability for septic systems. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Slide #10 <br /> The following slides include photo images <br /> from the 5 Rural Community Activity Modes <br /> (roadway intersection views) <br /> ©RANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> 27 <br /> 28 <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.