Browse
Search
Agenda 12-09-2025; 7-a - Update on Revaluation Appeals and Neighborhood Reviews
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 12-09-2025; 7-a - Update on Revaluation Appeals and Neighborhood Reviews
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 3:12:06 PM
Creation date
12/4/2025 3:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/9/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for December 9, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 12-09-2025 Business Meeting
ORD-2025-038-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #4
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-039-North Carolina Governor's Highway Safety Program
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-040-Award of bid for installation and replacement of booths at Solid Waste and recycling centers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-041-Fiscal year 2025-26 budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
ORD-2025-042-Transit scheduling and dispatch software agreement approval and approval of budget amendment #5
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-107-Public Hearing Regarding a Proposed Economic Development Recruitment incentive and performance agreement between Orange County and CITEL America
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
RES-2025-065-Motor Vehicle Property Tax Releases Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-066-Property Tax Release Refund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> Neighborhood Reviews <br /> The Tax Office conducted an equity analysis on the County's 1,026 assessment neighborhoods. <br /> The International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) specifies that measures of vertical <br /> equity are only representative of possible inequities in neighborhoods that have a statistically <br /> significant amount of sales. Based on that, the Tax Office reviewed the neighborhoods with five <br /> (5) sales or more and identified 86 neighborhoods that were outside of the equity standards used <br /> by the IAAO. Of the neighborhoods with less than five (5) sales, the Tax Office examined those <br /> neighborhoods for consistency and reasonableness and identified an additional 76 <br /> neighborhoods that required a more thorough review. The Tax Office also studied the 19 <br /> neighborhoods identified by the Orange County Property Tax Justice Coalition for possible value <br /> adjustments. A total of 171 neighborhoods were identified by the Tax Office for closer review. If <br /> value adjustments are made as a result of the neighborhood reviews, property owners will receive <br /> notice of the change and will have fifteen (15) days to appeal that change to the Board of <br /> Equalization and Review. <br /> Tanner Valuation Group is assisting the Tax Office with the neighborhood level reviews. As of <br /> November 26, 2025, 152 neighborhood reviews or 89% have been completed. Those reviews <br /> resulted in value adjustments to 1,460 properties and a total assessed value decrease of <br /> $60,972,300. The remaining 19 neighborhoods will be completed by December 19, 2025. <br /> While conducting the neighborhood reviews, the Tanner Group observed some common issues <br /> warranting a decrease to the original assessed value. The most common reason that assessed <br /> values were reduced during the neighborhood review process was that the original assessed <br /> value was not discounted due to deferred maintenance. During the appraisal process, Orange <br /> County appraisers conducted roadside evaluations of approximately 10,000 of the approximately <br /> 58,000 properties in Orange County. The roadside review can result in a reduction in value due <br /> to deferred maintainance if it can be obseved on the exterior of the property, but appraisers do <br /> not inspect the interior of homes unless they are invited. As a result, properties that were not <br /> viewed by appraisers in a roadside evaluation and properties where maintenance was deferred <br /> on the interior would not have been accounted for in the original value assessment. A question <br /> about best practices for identifying, verifying, and accounting for deferred maintenance will be <br /> added to the Tax Assessment Work Group Request for Proposal for consulting services. <br /> Tanner Valuation Group also noted that some neighborhoods in Orange County, particularly near <br /> the University, include a variety of housing types. Mass appraisal generally assumes that <br /> properties in a neighborhood are like one another. However, some neighborhoods in Orange <br /> County have very diverse houising types where older, owner-occupied properties are situated <br /> next to properties that have undergone extensive renovation or are income producing student <br /> rentals. The conservation neighborhoods in Chapel Hill such as Northside also have restrictions <br /> on how large a property can be if an older home were removed and a new home constructed. <br /> These restrictions limit the potential value, and, therefore, also limit the assessed value. <br /> On the statistical measures of vertical equity, the Tanner Group noted that the statistical analysis <br /> conducted by the Tax Office included the sales data dating back to 2021. If those sales are <br /> appraised using market conditions in 2024, the assessed value would likely be much higher than <br /> the sale price in 2021 given market pressure that raised prices since then. Tanner would <br /> recommend limiting the analysis to more recent sales data. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.