Browse
Search
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:13:20 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 Draft <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Kyle Myers: I was just going to ask that we can confirm that appropriate notice was provided, and we filed <br /> 3 the letter that was dated the 29th does meet the criteria for notice. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Leon Meyers: Taylor or Cy, could you respond, please? <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Cy Stober: Correct and I would note for the record that that far exceeds the notification requirements of <br /> 8 the general statute. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Kyle Myers: Thank you. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: Any other questions for Ms. Lormand or motion on standing? <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Beth Bronson: No. I do see the submission of standing, now. Okay. I'm not really sure how to proceed with <br /> 15 this if nobody's counsel is able to appear tonight. But the applicant has been able to provide <br /> 16 all of the required notice and follow all of the steps necessary for a special-use permit. <br /> 17 Because there is no submission of appeal in a way that would create its own agenda item. 1 <br /> 18 don't know. Yeah. Does anybody else have thoughts on this? <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Leon Meyers: Well, that was related to my thinking about the order of business for tonight. But, you <br /> 21 understand, I'm sure,what Beth is saying is that we have folks who say they haven't had time <br /> 22 to prepare and we've encountered this in the past. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Jeff Scott: Yeah, I mean if we were to go back on what we've done in the past, it's like if we changed our <br /> 25 minds this time around, it will be going against pretty much what was advertised,the timelines <br /> 26 and everything like that, and fortunately or unfortunately, it's just, that's the process. <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Leon Meyers: All right, any other thoughts or questions or a motion on Ms. Lormand's standing? <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Beth Bronson: I think because there is a written agreement for this driveway, we do need to consider the <br /> 31 standing of any adjacent neighbor because this is the road that everybody lives off of and they <br /> 32 share a driveway,easement or not with this business and this applicant. So,that's my position <br /> 33 on that. Does that make sense? <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Jeff Scott: I think it does. I guess is there more information about the easement or the right-of-way or <br /> 36 the maintenance of it. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Beth Bronson: If anybody had a copy of that? <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Jeff Scott: Yeah, if there was some kind of evidence or, formal agreement, it would make a lot of sense <br /> 41 because that would directly impact you and/or the owners. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Sarah Lormand: A copy of our road maintenance agreement? <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Jeff Scott: Something, yeah. Something in writing. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Sarah Lormand: I have it. I believe I either have it in my email, or she may have it in her paperwork. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Leon Meyers: The application package includes a reference to such an agreement but not the agreement <br /> 50 itself. <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.