Browse
Search
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:13:20 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
62 Draft <br /> 1 Leon Meyers: Well, and one way would be to begin the discussion among the board here and see if we can <br /> 2 agree. It seems to me it just is a couple of conditions that we need to settle on. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Beth Bronson: Yeah. Can we just address the idea of the site plan? What conditions are needed in submitted <br /> 5 site plan for approval? So, if we were to go ahead and move forward with the special use permit, <br /> 6 what would need to be included in the site plan? Such as Type B buffering along the entire <br /> 7 property, including what already exists? <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Jeff Scott: I just don't think, I just don't think that makes sense. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Kyle Myers: Yeah. I'm not in support of that either. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Beth Bronson: Exactly. So, then what we want to think about is, okay, so what is the buffering and fencing on the <br /> 14 care facility? <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Kyle Myers: Personally, I'd rather have them work that out with county. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Jeff Scott: Yeah. I'm just saying. I don't see it being a critical item. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Kyle Myers: Yeah, agreed. It's in the UDO. So, as long as the county enforces what's in the UDO, I think they <br /> 21 have to follow the law. I do think it's appropriate that there is a condition on the maximum number <br /> 22 of people. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Leon Meyers: And the applicant has agreed to 22 maximum clients and staff. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Beth Bronson: I think that that's a lot more restrictive than you think it is and moving it to like 25 or something like <br /> 27 that. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Kyle Myers: Yeah, and I don't want to be unreasonable. I'm with you. I thought about that. I think the, I think <br /> 30 that the establishment of the definition of care was important to me. I am concerned about <br /> 31 unregulated expansion, but I think the staff has advised that the system already is in existence to <br /> 32 require future applications that prevent unregulated expansion. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Beth Bronson: And the applicant has explained that there is a Iicensure restriction as well on staff-to-client ratio. <br /> 35 So, again, without getting into the specifics of that. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Leon Meyers: So, are we no saying no limit on combined clients and staff? <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Kyle Myers: No, I think that's important. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Beth Bronson: A limit. Yeah, I think that's fine. <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Leon Meyers: And 22 is the right number? <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Kyle Myers: 1, again, I don't want to be unreasonable, but that's what council stated. If it needs to be 25, they <br /> 46 would have to come back before the board and ask for it. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Beth Bronson: We're talking about 25 people in the Cohort 1, that 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. <br /> 62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.