Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
57 Draft <br /> 1 Leon Meyers: So, the language, 22 clients and staff, that works for you? <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Cy Stober: Yes. <br /> 4 <br /> 5 Leon Meyers: Okay. Board members other questions? <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Kyle Myers: Not a question, but a statement. The site plan that was submitted was purely for the purposes of <br /> 8 sharing an exhibit, but you were earlier talking about a site plan would be required to move forward <br /> 9 with any additional changes. So, I don't think that needs to be a condition, because it would be <br /> 10 required if they were to submit for any type of building. Right? <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Leon Meyers: That's a question for Cy. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Cy Stober: Yes, yes. Dr. Dennis' testimony before, if they revoke their farm status, that would be the case. <br /> 15 Yes. The special use permit would apply. If the farm status persists, we get into a lot of; is this for <br /> 16 farm use or is it for the clinic use? And that is more difficult question to answer, then. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Leon Meyers: Okay. Anything else? Board members? <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Beth Bronson: For Subsection H, Fencing and/or Screening, there's just a significant portion of the property that <br /> 21 does not have any kind of screening or fencing. And to assign the special use permit to the entire <br /> 22 property would, I feel like, necessitate that Type B border at a minimum. I was looking at the <br /> 23 different borders, and I think that does need to be a condition. Should we move forward with the <br /> 24 special use permit? In the sense that any of the adjacent properties need to have that 30-foot <br /> 25 buffer with the Type B buffering. As far as options go for that, I feel like we need to clarify. And 1 <br /> 26 had it, but I don't have it right now. Can you remind me the section of the buffer? <br /> 27 <br /> 28 Cy Stober: 6.8. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Beth Bronson: Table? 6.8. Thank you. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Kyle Myers: Yeah. And that's kind of where I was going. The site plan would have to meet not only buffer <br /> 33 requirements, but applicable zoning requirements. And someone talked about 100 feet earlier, and <br /> 34 it's not shown on the, think it's the plan north side of where the proposed building would be. All of <br /> 35 that would be handled under any type of application moving forward for any building. Those things <br /> 36 would be required in that site plan. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Leon Meyers: But not unless it's in the UDO or unless the board adds a condition. Right? <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Kyle Myers: Right. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Beth Bronson: As I'm proposing. Side note, I think that the north parcel line is the least of the concern at this point. <br /> 43 As in, the property owner is okay with it. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 Leon Meyers: Beth, you referred to a requirement for fencing that I don't see in the staff report. Maybe I'm just <br /> 46 missing it. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Beth Bronson: It's their interpretation of the garden area. <br /> 49 <br /> 57 <br />