Browse
Search
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Board of Adjustment
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
12.10.25 BOA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2025 11:13:20 AM
Creation date
12/4/2025 10:52:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/10/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
51 Draft <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Taylor Perschau: Go for it. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Kevin Hornik: But the UDO also allows for buffers to be variable depending on existing vegetation conditions. <br /> 5 Is that right? <br /> 6 <br /> 7 Taylor Perschau: That's correct. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 Kevin Hornik: And so that's why we proposed the condition I mentioned earlier that this be approved. The, <br /> 10 the applicant has expressed a willingness to work with county staff to plant additional buffering <br /> 11 to the extent that county staff believe it's necessary to meet that variable. You know, the 30 <br /> 12 feet type B buffer requirement or the variable buffer standard that's provided by the UDO. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Leon Meyers: There's no buffer at all shown on the, the southern property line adjacent to Lot 8, right? <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Kevin Hornik: So again, that condition the client has, the applicant has offered to install whatever type of <br /> 17 buffer to either you or county staff believe is appropriate, up to a 30-foot, Type B buffer as a <br /> 18 condition of approval of the special use permit. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Leon Meyers: All right, thank you. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Cy Stober: If I can just reiterate a point Taylor made before the garden areas are an acceptable use in <br /> 23 the buffer area and maybe permitted as part of the landscape buffer. Just for clarity for the <br /> 24 Board as and just reiterating that. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Leon Meyers: The only buffer called out on the site plan that 1, as I read it anyway, is on that eastern <br /> 27 boundary. And, and sorry, what are you saying about the, the buffer on the south property <br /> 28 line? <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Cy Stober: Sure. So as Taylor stated before, this would go through staff review again to make sure that <br /> 31 it complies with all ordinance standards and that buffer would be enforced. There is variability <br /> 32 as Mr. Hornik has, has stated, and garden areas are permitted within the buffer to basically <br /> 33 function as the buffer. And could do so there. But yes, you're correct. The only called out <br /> 34 buffer area is that eastern perimeter, but any, this not placing the buffers on here does not <br /> 35 exempt them. There's no condition of exemption from the UDO standards here to not apply <br /> 36 the buffers on site. So, there's variability permitted in their application per the UDO, but the <br /> 37 only prescribed buffer is that 30-foot buffer on the eastern perimeter. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Leon Meyers: But the UDO requires buffers. <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Beth Bronson: But that's for the road frontage. What we would need to do is out of a condition for the adjacent <br /> 42 partial line. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Cy Stober: Yes. If you'd like a specific buffer for the perimeter on the adjoining property lines, that would <br /> 45 need to be a condition of approval. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Beth Bronson: Okay. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Kevin Hornik: And again, the client is happy to, to accept whatever condition the board feels is necessary. <br /> 50 We had discussed with county staff a, after a potential SUP approval,working with staff at the <br /> 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.