Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
48 Draft <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Beth Bronson: Certainly. So, there's no, I just want the record to be correct. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Kevin Hornik: There's no doubt we're talking 75 square feet per client at any given time. You've heard <br /> 5 testimony that there is that there are no more than ten clients on the site at any given time, <br /> 6 you know? What is an acre is 40,000 square feet. What's 40,000 divided by ten? Four <br /> 7 hundred square feet per client at any given time? I think that criteria has been satisfied. We <br /> 8 have at least four times as much outdoor space within the fenced area, as is called for by the <br /> 9 UDO. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Cy Stober: Can I just request that Mr. Hornik reiterate what Dr. Dennis said? Just we need it in the mic <br /> 12 for the record, please. About the fenced in area. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 Kevin Hornik: Dr. Dennis said that there is at least a 1 acre segment that is entirely fenced in. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Cy Stober: Thank you. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Beth Bronson: Thank you. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Kevin Hornik: All right. Again, I think this one has already also been addressed by Dr. Dennis in her <br /> 21 testimony. The self-latch unit and self-closing gates will be installed on Monday. Certainly, <br /> 22 that is something that the applicant has agreed to provide. And then again, this is the final <br /> 23 one. And we talked about this a little bit earlier, and I think Cy alluded to it. The facility will <br /> 24 be reviewed annually by the planning director to ensure compliance with the standards. This <br /> 25 is not something that I guess we can meet right now, but the applicant certainly has agreed <br /> 26 to cooperate with any review that is conducted by planning staff. So that is a demonstration <br /> 27 that all of the applicable re-review criteria have been met by competent material and <br /> 28 substantial evidence in the record. You've heard from three qualified expert witnesses today. <br /> 29 You've also heard from Dr. Dennis in kind of her non-expert or like capacity in terms of how <br /> 30 the site operates. So, I don't think we have anything more for the Board if you, unless you <br /> 31 have questions for us. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Leon Meyers: All right. Board members questions for the applicant? <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Kyle Myers: I don't have any questions for the applicant. I do have some staff clarifications. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Leon Meyers: While Mr. Hornik is there let me come back to 5.8.2(c) and the, this direct frontage question. <br /> 38 Maybe it's a question for James. He doesn't look surprised. The direct frontage. I think it's <br /> 39 fair to say that if you read the sentence there is direct frontage and access on a public state- <br /> 40 maintained road common usage direct frontage would suggest that there is some frontage <br /> 41 between this parcel and a publicly maintained road. Mr. Hornik has offered another definition <br /> 42 of frontage for compliance here. Do you have any thoughts about that? <br /> 43 <br /> 44 James Bryan: Yeah, I apologize. I was not surprised that you asked me a question, but I do have to gather <br /> 45 my thoughts on it. Okay. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Beth Bronson: Well, if you'd like to think about it, I have a question to piggyback off of it. <br /> 48 <br /> 49 James Bryan: Please. <br /> 50 <br /> 48 <br />