Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
35 Draft <br /> 1 <br /> 2 John McPhaul: Yes, and I if it was an amphitheater, it might cause more trouble, but I think that the fact that <br /> 3 it's you know, 1, it's hard for me to discern what would be the difference between this facility, <br /> 4 a church, or a horse stable. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Beth Bronson: Exactly. And so, in your opinion, your expert opinion, no matter if it was a church, horse <br /> 7 stable. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 John McPhaul: Yeah. You know, that's why I arrived where I arrived. <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Beth Bronson: Okay. Thank you very much. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Kevin Hornik: All right. Thanks John. Okay. Your question did bring up a point that I think I might ask Nora <br /> 14 to come back up an address or Mr. Myers, it might have been your question. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 Beth Bronson: And I do want to clarify that Mr. Myers, he did point out that this appraisal or this farm impact <br /> 17 on nearby values does not include any future building. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Kyle Myers: Right. So, Nora, because the question has been brought up,why this future building envelope <br /> 20 exists on the site plan. Can you answer that question? You know, and, and I suppose as <br /> 21 kind of a corollary to that,do you have any intention at present to build anything in that building, <br /> 22 that building envelope shown on the site plan? <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Nora Dennis: No, I was advised if I ever might want to build something on this land, I should put a building <br /> 25 envelope on it. I have no plans anytime. I have no money to do that. So. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 Kyle Myers: And, and advised by? <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Nora Dennis: By the planning department. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Kevin Hornik: The point is I think, and I just want to make clear that the only reason that that proposed <br /> 32 building envelope appears on the site plan is because we were advised by county staff that if <br /> 33 there were ever any hypothetical possibility that something might be added, we should note <br /> 34 that on the site plan. I think just for continuity's sake. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Beth Bronson: Because this is a special-use permit. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Kevin Hornik: Right. And, and as you'll see, one of the review criteria is that we'll have annual updates or <br /> 39 review by county staff. So hypothetically speaking, if we wanted to add something down the <br /> 40 road, that would probably require, although I'm sure it'll be context specific, an amendment to <br /> 41 the to the special-use permit. And having that identified on the site plan would, I think, be <br /> 42 helpful or useful for staff in the event that an amendment is ever applied for in the future. So, <br /> 43 1 just, it's a long-winded way and, and probably unnecessary way of saying that, that is not a <br /> 44 signal that the applicant proposes to add or expand anything right now. That was done solely <br /> 45 at the request of and for the convenience of county staff. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Beth Bronson: And you are confirming that this building site is at least 100 feet away from the northern <br /> 48 property. <br /> 49 <br /> 50 Nora Dennis: That was what I asked the surveyor to do. <br /> 35 <br />