Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
16 Draft <br /> 1 <br /> 2 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Kyle Myers: So access was reviewed as part of the application? Okay. <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Leon Meyers: I believe there was a DOT, some kind of DOT submission, right, I think on Page 21. <br /> 7 <br /> 8 Cy Stober: Correct, that is part of the application which will be reviewed with the submittal of evidence. <br /> 9 <br /> 10 Kevin Hornik: If I may, during the applicant's case in chief,we do have a traffic engineer here who will testify <br /> 11 about the means of access, the sufficiency of Dodson Knoll Road. <br /> 12 <br /> 13 Leon Meyers: Right. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 Kevin Hornik: So to the extent there are questions about that aspect, I think that will be addressed during <br /> 16 the special-use permit case in chief. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Leon Meyers: Any other questions for Ms. Stracke or discussion or a motion regarding Ms. Stracke's <br /> 19 standing? <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Beth Bronson: Back to the conversation of this is this easement, this, that she's brought forth is not actually <br /> 22 on the property that is under question, the parcel under question. <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Kyle Myers: Correct. It is not. The easement does not have an interest on the property. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 Beth Bronson: Yes and given James' guidance on what we are supposed to be looking at tonight and how <br /> 27 we are. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 Leon Meyers: Well, right now, we're looking at determining standing for Ms. Stracke. Right? <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Beth Bronson: Right. It's one without the other. There isn't one without the other, to me. Right? <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Leon Meyers: Okay. <br /> 34 <br /> 35 Beth Bronson: In the sense that, well, you're talking about common sense when you're talking about <br /> 36 representation, right, not to be capricious, but it is understandable that this person would have <br /> 37 standing in the fact that their easement is the road frontage for this business. So their access <br /> 38 is what is on this public road. That would be my argument that this is, that this person does <br /> 39 have standing because the public access to this special-use permit, this parcel of the special- <br /> 40 use permit, is in question. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Jeff Scott: But it's not on the property. <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Beth Bronson: But it's on the road frontage to get to the property. Right? So the public road, Dairyland, <br /> 45 exists on Ms. Stracke's property. For the sole fact that it's on the road frontage would be <br /> 46 enough for me to establish standing for this person. <br /> 47 <br /> 48 Leon Meyers: We just heard James explain that the easement interest relates to the subject property. <br /> 49 <br /> 16 <br />