Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-20-2005-6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 09-20-2005
>
Agenda - 09-20-2005-6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 3:56:19 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:45:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/20/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050920
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
RES-2005-071 Comments to TAC or DCHC MPO on transportation priorities list for 2007-2013 improvement program
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />The Board of Commissioners approved its priority list March 15' 2005 (Attachment 2, pages 48 - <br />51), Two of Orange County s priority projects rank in the top 26 of the 44 projects submitted by <br />Orange County jurisdictions (top 22 of the 87 projects submitted by all local jurisdictions in the <br />MPO). The following lists Orange County's priorities compared to Division 7 and regional priority <br />ranking: <br /> <br />Oran e Count Priorit Division 7 <br />Priorit Regional <br />Priorit <br />1. Oran e Grove Road edestrian brid e over I-40 3 9 <br />2. Homestead Road im rovements 20 43 <br />3. Im rovements to South Churton Street 2 7 <br />4. Old NC 86 bic cle lanes 28 55 <br />5. NC 86 bic cle lanes 20 43 <br />6. NC 86 Im rovements north of Hillsborou h 44 86 <br />7. US 70 B ass Widenin 43 85 <br />8. Eno Mountain Rd./Mayo St./Orange Grove Rd. <br />intersection reali nment <br />20 <br />43 <br />9. Oran e Grove Rd. extension to US 70 Business 27 53 <br />TAC members may request that the regional priority ranking of a project be switched with the <br />ranking of another project submitted by the same jurisdiction to ensure that the local jurisdiction's <br />priorities are addressed. For example, Orange County may request that bicycle lanes on Old NC <br />86 (Orange County priority 4, Division 7 pricrity 28) be moved to Division 7 priority 20 in place of <br />bicycle lanes on NC 86 (Orange County priority 5, Division 7 priority 20) and vice versa. The TAC <br />will also decide the ranking for projects scaring the same number of points, which are all <br />represented having the same rank in the draft regional priority list, For example, three of the seven <br />projects having a rank of 20 in the Division 7 list (Figure 5) are Orange County priorities. Only one <br />of the seven projects will have a final priority of number 20 (43 in regional list in Figure 3). The <br />other projects having a rank of 20 will take their places from priority 21 to priority 26 (priority 44 to <br />priority 52 in the Regional Priority List (Attachment 2, Figure 3), <br />The attached resolution also addresses TIP Project I-0305, widening of I-85 from I-40 to the <br />Orange/Durham County Line, The NCDOT MPO Coordinator has asked the Lead Planning Agency <br />to rate that project using the ranking criteria used far other projects in the regional priority list, and <br />to include it in the final draft priority list that will be considered by the TAC, "because of the project's <br />importance to the Department" (Attachment 3, letter from Michael Orr). That letter was sent in <br />response to an action taken by the TAC at its meeting on August 10, 2005. <br />The TAC, at its meeting on August 10, 2005, adopted a Metropolitan Transportation Improvement <br />Program (MTIP) for FY 2006-2012 that was different from the 2006-2012 STIP recently approved <br />by the NGDOT. One of the differences concerned the description of Project I-0305. The TAC <br />approved the description only "to reconstruct interchanges and structures", <br />Attachment 3 (page 52) is the letter from the NCDOT MPO Coordinator in which he gives reasons <br />to reinstate the project description that includes widening I-85 to six lanes in the 2007-2013 TIP. <br />Orange County has previously submitted comments regarding other features desired by the County <br />as part of the project. Those comments are included in the attached resclution, <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this item, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.