Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet - December 3, 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
PB Agenda Packet - December 3, 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 3:59:07 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 3:57:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/3/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> 55 MOTION BY Statler Gilfillen to approve the September 3rd meeting minutes. Seconded by Venkat Yendapalli. <br /> 56 <br /> 57 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY <br /> 58 <br /> 59 I'll note that,for the record, it's unanimous approval of those meeting minutes. <br /> 60 <br /> 61 AGENDA ITEM 4: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA <br /> 62 <br /> 63 Lamar Proctor: No.4 is consideration of additions to the agenda. There are no planned additions to the agenda, <br /> 64 unless someone has a motion or anything. Hearing none, I will move to the public charge. <br /> 65 <br /> 66 AGENDA ITEM 5: PUBLIC CHARGE <br /> 67 <br /> 68 Lamar Proctor read the Public Charge. <br /> 69 <br /> 70 AGENDA ITEM 6: CHAIR COMMENTS <br /> 71 <br /> 72 Lamar Proctor: Chair comments: Just a couple of things. So,the way this,the next agenda item, No. 7, is a <br /> 73 continuation from our September meeting for a zoning atlas amendment. And the last time we <br /> 74 took a vote, that was evenly divided,so we're going to continue that. I will say that we had,we've <br /> 75 passed the point where there are members of the public who signed up to speak. I think everyone <br /> 76 who is here, except for one person, had signed up and spoken last time, and the time for public <br /> 77 comment is closed. I would note that there was one additional person who had signed up tonight <br /> 78 who was not signed up when this agenda item began to be considered, and after public comment <br /> 79 was closed, so our policy, and I'm asking staff to memorialize that policy, it's been our policy that <br /> 80 once public comment is closed,we don't take additional public sign-ups after that on a continued <br /> 81 meeting because it would just, it has the potential to just continue on, and we would never reach a <br /> 82 final decision on these agenda items. So, if you're a member of the public who signed up this <br /> 83 evening,that is our general policy, and that's our rule. Unless there's any board members who <br /> 84 feel differently, as chair, I would suggest we just move to Agenda Item 7. <br /> 85 <br /> 86 AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(CONDITIONAL DISTRICT)(CONTINUED)—To continue review and <br /> 87 make a recommendation to the BOCC on a Zoning Atlas Amendment to rezone+/-78.11 acres <br /> 88 (PIN: 9865-87-8090) located at 1039-UT NC 86 North, Hillsborough,within the Hillsborough <br /> 89 Township of Orange County.The proposed rezoning is from AR(Agricultural Residential)to R-CD <br /> 90 (Residential-Conditional District).The anticipated BOCC public hearing date is November 6, <br /> 91 2025. <br /> 92 <br /> 93 Lamar Proctor: In terms of discussion and any additional questions for the applicant does—so kind of blurred <br /> 94 from chair comments into Agenda Item 7, but so beginning Agenda Item 7,yes, Statler? <br /> 95 <br /> 96 Statler Gilfillen: Just as a question, if this is only one person with 3 minutes speaking, is that too much of an <br /> 97 interruption since they were not heard last time or able to speak last time?Maybe we let them <br /> 98 have flexibility to be heard this time? <br /> 99 <br /> 100 Chris Johnston: So,the only thing I would say is the public comment was during the time that we had,and at this <br /> 101 point, really what we're talking about is the board having the discussion with the additional time. <br /> 102 The point of order last time was that we needed additional time in order to review the <br /> 103 documentation and then make a decision on this. Now,what I will say in potentially support of <br /> 104 Statler's argument is there does appear to be some changes that have been made to the <br /> 105 presentation in regard to changes to the conditions that are being presented. So, I would argue <br /> 106 that we leave it as is and not necessarily have additional public comment. Additional items have <br /> 107 been submitted, and I think you could accept those. I guess that's another question. Is that <br /> 108 additional public comment at that point? <br /> 109 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.