Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
29 <br /> 1264 <br /> 1265 MOTION PASSED 8-1: Chris Johnston opposed. <br /> 1266 <br /> 1267 Lamar Proctor: And does he have to state his—no, all right. So that motion carries. How many of us are there, <br /> 1268 nine now? <br /> 1269 <br /> 1270 Cy Stober: Yeah. <br /> 1271 <br /> 1272 Lamar Proctor: So, eight to one,so that condition has been modified. And then I'll make a motion to add <br /> 1273 Condition 14 that the property owner shall write a letter to North Carolina DOT. <br /> 1274 <br /> 1275 Charity Kirk: Well, it's the developers, right? They're not the property owners yet,the developers. <br /> 1276 <br /> 1277 Lamar Proctor: Okay. <br /> 1278 <br /> 1279 Cy Stober: "The applicant"would be helpful. <br /> 1280 <br /> 1281 Lamar Proctor: Applicant. <br /> 1282 <br /> 1283 Charity Kirk: Applicant. <br /> 1284 <br /> 1285 Beth Trahos: I have used the term property owner throughout because the conditions apply to the landowner, <br /> 1286 and that just makes it run with the land, so that would be my preference but whichever. <br /> 1287 <br /> 1288 Charity Kirk: The property owner?The property owner is your preference? <br /> 1289 <br /> 1290 Cy Stober: I have no problem with that. <br /> 1291 <br /> 1292 Charity Kirk: Okay. <br /> 1293 <br /> 1294 Lamar Proctor: Okay. I was just being consistent with the language that was used. So, are y'all cool with <br /> 1295 property owner? <br /> 1296 <br /> 1297 Charity Kirk: Yeah,that's fine. <br /> 1298 <br /> 1299 Lamar Proctor: Okay, so I make a motion to add Condition 14 that the property owner shall write a letter to North <br /> 1300 Carolina DOT requesting a speed-limit reduction. Do I have a second? <br /> 1301 <br /> 1302 Beth Bronson: I will second that. <br /> 1303 <br /> 1304 Lamar Proctor: All right, Beth seconds. All in favor of adding that condition raise your hand. <br /> 1305 <br /> 1306 MOTION BY Lamar Proctor to create condition 14. Seconded by Beth Bronson. <br /> 1307 <br /> 1308 MOTION PASSED 8-1:Venkat Yendapalli opposed. <br /> 1309 <br /> 1310 Lamar Proctor: So, eight. All those opposed? Venkat's opposed, so once again eight to one to add that <br /> 1311 condition. So,the next motion would be a motion to adopt the statement of consistency.Which <br /> 1312 attachment number is it currently? I don't remember. <br /> 1313 <br /> 1314 Beth Bronson: It was Attachment 7. <br /> 1315 <br /> 1316 Lamar Proctor: That's what I remember. <br /> 1317 <br /> 1318 Beth Bronson: That was the draft ordinance approving it. <br />