Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
24 <br /> 989 <br /> 990 Laura Haywood: I'm Laura Haywood. I just wanted to point out,too,that with your concern the ARC that we would <br /> 991 include in our HOA documents,we would be able to put conditions like that where the HOA is <br /> 992 going to restrict and limit. It's my understanding that as far as this application is concerned, that <br /> 993 right now, as far as a condition is concerned, can't be accepted because it would be overseen by <br /> 994 the HOA. So, but that's how we would address that in the ARCs. <br /> 995 <br /> 996 Statler Gilfillen: I would only like to add not only in the comments there, but in the comments, making sure that it's <br /> 997 enforceable. <br /> 998 <br /> 999 Laura Haywood: Absolutely. <br /> 1000 <br /> 1001 Statler Gilfillen: Okay. <br /> 1002 <br /> 1003 Beth Bronson: Just to build off of what she is saying, in the sense that this is for a zoning atlas amendment and <br /> 1004 not for the subdivision itself? <br /> 1005 <br /> 1006 Cy Stober: Correct. <br /> 1007 <br /> 1008 Beth Bronson: Okay. <br /> 1009 <br /> 1010 Cy Stober: So civil matters are not managed. HOA matters are not regulated by the county. We do have <br /> 1011 subdivision regulations. Those will need to be complied by this applicant, as this is a zoning atlas <br /> 1012 amendment, and any conditions that are offered today for any relief from the county standards <br /> 1013 from either the subdivision standards or our site plan standards or other use standards would <br /> 1014 need to be included as a condition. Otherwise, all of those regulations must be complied with, <br /> 1015 including all subdivision regulations. <br /> 1016 <br /> 1017 Beth Bronson: Right,thank you. And, again,just to clarify for the board and for residents that this is for the <br /> 1018 rezoning from agricultural-residential to a higher density parcel - <br /> 1019 <br /> 1020 Cy Stober: No. <br /> 1021 <br /> 1022 Beth Bronson: Right? <br /> 1023 <br /> 1024 Cy Stober: No. <br /> 1025 <br /> 1026 Beth Bronson: No? Sorry. <br /> 1027 <br /> 1028 Cy Stober: So, it's for 49 lots on a 78-acre property, but it's in a conservation cluster land-use pattern,which <br /> 1029 allows for lots, in this case, as small as 20,000 square feet. <br /> 1030 <br /> 1031 Beth Bronson: True. So, it doesn't actually change agricultural. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. <br /> 1032 <br /> 1033 David Barcal: And,the septic systems, by rule, can't be any closer than 10 feet to a property line, so you would <br /> 1034 in theory have a minimum 20 feet separation between septic systems,so. <br /> 1035 <br /> 1036 Statler Gilfillen: Thank you. <br /> 1037 <br /> 1038 Lamar Proctor: Are there any other questions for the applicant? Hearing none, are there, is there any discussion? <br /> 1039 1 will just start by saying that it's clear that it's that intersection has traffic concerns and will <br /> 1040 continue to have traffic concerns, so I recognize that. But what I also do recognize is that that <br /> 1041 property that this conditional zoning atlas amendment does develop the property in a responsible <br /> 1042 way that with lower density than allowed by the agricultural-residential zoning. It does seem to be <br /> 1043 a responsible way to develop the property and maintain some open spaces, and I appreciate their <br />