2025_10_30 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:5E70BEDB-1C5C-4D06-AFFC-C88435F8F715 • County staff visited the property for physical verification purposes and photos. The County also reviewed the appellant's supporting documentation. A sales analysis of comparable units was also reviewed,using sales that occurred in 2024 as they are more representative of market conditions as of January 1,2025. • After review, the County recommends reducing the Effective Year Built from 2021 to 1997. This adjustment will account for the lack of updates associated with this unit. The County recommends a revised value of$244,400 for the subject property. • Subject Photo • Subject Photo#2 • GIS Map • Subject Plat • Subject Permit • Property Record Card Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $244,400 Made the motion Richal Vanhook Seconded the motion Saru Salvi Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Provertv Identification: Property Owner Paul Smith Appellant(if different Property Address 3160 Forest Knolls Road Parcel ID or Abstract 19749890447 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on easement, creek, and riparian buffer. Current Assessed Value $761,600 ounty Opinion $761,600 Time of Hearin 10:07 AM Appellant Opinion $600,000 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $761,600 No Change Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant states: • "Please take into account: -This is a private road and there is easement access -The land the property sits on has a creek nearby and a riparian buffer is maintained." • No supporting documentation was provided with this appeal. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • Property Review Summary—3160 Forest Knoll Drive,Chapel Hill • The subject property consists of a 7.22-acre tract improved with a 2,477-square-foot single-family dwelling. The appellant states that the property is located on a private road with easement access and that a nearby creek includes a maintained riparian buffer. • County staff conducted a site visit for physical verification and photographs. The County also reviewed the appellant's statements and available documentation. While the appellant noted concerns regarding private road access and riparian buffer restrictions, no supporting evidence or documentation was submitted to substantiate these claims. The County reviewed the recorded plat associated with the property and did not identify any issues that would warrant an adjustment to the land value.