2025_10_30 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:5E70BEDB-1C5C-4D06-AFFC-C88435F8F715 • The County recommends a revised assessed value of$259,900 for the subject property. • Subject Photo • GIS Map • Sales Analysis • Current Property Record Card • Proposed Property Record Card Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $259,900 Made the motion Saru Salvi Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against ... Property Identification: Property Owner I Carl D. Atkins Trustee Appellant(if different) Property Address 16526 NC 49 Parcel ID or Abstract 19829616436 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on perceived excessive increase, condition, proximity to road, and comparable properties. Current Assessed Value $131,600 ounty Opinion $111,600 Time of Hearin 9:57 AM Appellant Opinion $93,225 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $111,600 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant contends that the 65%increase in the assessed value of the subject property is excessive, citing that the property is in below-average condition. The appellant also notes that the dwelling is situated approximately 22 feet from the Highway 49 right-of-way,which they believe negatively impacts the property's value. To support their opinion of value,the appellant submitted two comparable sales for consideration. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • Property Information: The subject property is a 1.21-acre tract with a 798-square-foot single- family dwelling, located at 6526 NC Highway 49 in Mebane. • Appellant's Statement: The appellant contends that the 65% increase in assessed value is excessive given the issues associated with the property. Two comparable properties were submitted as supporting documentation. • County Review: County staff conducted a physical inspection of the property. The appellant's submittal was reviewed in detail. The two comparables provided by the appellant-7275 Atkins Road and 7284 Highway 49—were both active listings and therefore could not be considered as valid sales for valuation purposes. • In addition,the County analyzed recent land sales within the subject neighborhood. These sales involved significantly larger tracts than the subject property,resulting in substantially lower prices per acre and limited comparability. • Following the physical inspection and review of the appeal,the County recommends the following adjustments to better reflect the property's characteristics and market position: - Change GP Glazed Porch to EP Enclosed Porch