2025_10_30 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:A845A664-1 FD8-47D6-8435-6C2FDECBEA46 • The appellant did not submit any supporting documentation to justify the requested change in value. An email was sent to the appellant requesting additional information regarding the building's characteristics and use. However, no response was received. • In the absence of any supporting evidence or documentation and based on the County's verified property data and valuation model,the County recommends no change to the current assessed value. • Current Property Record Card • Aerial Photo • Photo Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $845,300 No Change Made the motion Saru Salvi Seconded the motion Barbara Levine Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against ... Property Identification: Property Owner Xiajuan Yin Appellant(if different) Property Address 315 Palafox Drive Parcel ID or Abstract 19880141766 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on condition of house. Current Assessed Value $943,500 ounty Opinion $921,800 Time of Hearin 3:27 PM Appellant Opinion $843,225 County Representative Bill Hiltbold Board Decision $856,000($/SF ad'.per comps) Evidence submitted by the appellant: • Condition of my house: While my home has larger square footage, its market value is impacted by the absence of upgrades. In this area,buyers place significant value on updated kitchens, bathrooms, and energy efficient systems,the features my 12 years old home does not have. Relying on square footage alone categorizes my home alongside fully renovated properties, which is not an accurate comparison. Please see the enclosed photos for reference. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • Only three of the comparable sales presented by the appellant may be considered. 115 Glenmore Road(above the gray line on the analysis report) is in a different neighborhood, Its land value is less than $300,000, its finished area is 1069 square feet above that of the subject, and its grade is B whereas the subject's grade is A-15.The three comps below the gray line calculate a mean value per square foot of$241 just as the subject,but the subject's building value per square foot is $18 higher than the mean of the comps.