Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID:6A24285A-81 BA-45BO-BD68-Cl1 D7E41 E41F0 <br /> subject's living area. Notice at the bottom of the total assessed value column,the subject is <br /> valued$24 to $26K above the average/median of the comparables. <br /> • I measured and corrected the front and back decks which are slightly larger than the 2024 <br /> sketch and the driveway is cracked and buckled. The county proposes changing the "good" <br /> physical condition in depreciation to "average" and the effective year built from 2001 to 1993. <br /> • If the board accepts these changes the building value would decrease from$234,700 to <br /> $210,500. Total property value would change from$536,900 to $512,700. <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Photos of Subject <br /> • Sales analysis <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $511,200 <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Teresa Perry Williams Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 221 Monarda Way Parcel ID or Abstract 9873258978 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the value of a comparable property. <br /> Current Assessed Value $500,800 ounty Opinion $478,800 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:08PM Appellant Opinion $470,000 <br /> County Representative Scott Zeman Board Decision $478,800 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The subject property should be valued equitably with 244 Rubrum Drive(PIN 9873360005). <br /> Both units have the same square footage and floor plan,but 244 Rubrum Drive has lower <br /> valuation due to a 5%design depreciation and a lower effective year built than the subject <br /> property. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • A county appraiser conducted a site review of the property on 10/23/2025. The appellant was <br /> notified by email and granted the appraiser permission to take photographs and verify property <br /> characteristics. Exterior photographs were taken by the appraiser.No interior photographs were <br /> obtained. <br /> • Appraiser observations and recommendations: <br /> ➢ GRADE: The residence has a grade of A-10. End unit townhouses in Waterstone <br /> Terraces have A-10 grades while interior units have B+10 grades. The subject is an <br /> end unit. No change to grade is recommended. <br />