Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Docusign Envelope ID:360B6188-lA59-4lB3-B839-FE17A47C9C50 <br /> Property Owner Ramon Fernandez Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 120 Apple Street Parcel ID or Abstract 19880518057 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on comparable sales. <br /> Current Assessed Value $505,500 ounty Opinion $505,500 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:15PM Appellant Opinion $475,000 <br /> County Representative Jimmy Milliken Board Decision $474,000 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • 5 comparable properties closest in size and distance to my house have an average price of <br /> 475,000. Every one of those comparables have MORE square footage than my house at 1,376 <br /> square feet. The prices are 495K-460k-460K-480K-480K-475K=average of$475,000. With an <br /> average square footage of 1,485 square feet. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a one-story home located at 120 Apple Street,was built in 1985, and <br /> contains 1,376 square feet. I reviewed the submitted documentation. On the Comper report <br /> submitted by the appellant, Comp#1 is the most comparable,but has a slab foundation which <br /> carries no value, whereas the subject's foundation is a crawl space,which is superior to a slab <br /> foundation and is valued as such, leaving the values not so similar for that size property. Comp <br /> #2 is a multi-story property and Comp#4 has added physical depreciation due to foundation <br /> issues causing ceiling cracks. Comps#3,#5, and#6 are slightly larger one-story homes. <br /> • 1 created an analysis that illustrates equity and sales in the neighborhood.Using price per <br /> square foot does not accurately represent all components of properties, as it just takes the <br /> overall value with all components and divides it by the amount of living area. All properties <br /> have different attachments, such as porches, decks,patios, etc.that are valued based on type <br /> and size. The subject property is in the range of like properties and based on this,the County <br /> suggests no change in valuation. <br /> • Analysis <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Maps <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> Motion of the Board Accept County's Proposed Value: Change the effective year built to <br /> 1985,the actual year built and <br /> change the condition from Average <br /> to Fair resulting in a revised value of <br /> $474,000 <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br />