Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Docusign Envelope ID:360B6188-lA59-4lB3-B839-FE17A47C9C50 <br /> • For market reference, 109 Camille Court, containing 2,322 square feet sold in February of <br /> 2021 for$437,500 and sold again in July of 2023 for$651,000. That is a difference of <br /> $213,000 in less than 30 months.No permits for upgrades, only a sales listing that states the <br /> kitchen has newer stainless appliances. <br /> • I created an analysis with properties in the subject's NBC of similar size based on County <br /> records. Calculations are generated by the CAMA system using the Orange County Schedule <br /> of Values. Based on the analysis,the County recommends no change in value. <br /> • Analysis <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Maps <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $639,100 No Change in Value <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Paul Callahan Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 1322 Arborgate Circle Parcel ID or Abstract 9890605507.149 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on a comparable sale and current listings. <br /> Current Assessed Value $321,300 County Opinion $305,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:22PM Appellant Opinion $283,550 <br /> County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $305,200 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant states that the assessment is too high and provided one late 2024 comparable sale <br /> and two 2025 listings as supporting evidence. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a 1,160 square foot condominium located in the Providence Glen <br /> Condominium project, in Chapel Hill. The County reviewed the appellant's supporting <br /> documentation that was provided with this appeal. The two 2025 listings provided by the <br /> appellant were not considered. The appellant provided one comparable sale from late 2024, <br /> 1611 Providence Glen Drive. This sale was reviewed by the County and was included in the <br /> County's analysis of 2024 comparable sales. After review,the County recommends the <br /> following change: applying a 0.95%construction modifier to the subject property. This <br /> adjustment would reduce the subject property's assessment to$305,200,bringing its value in <br /> line with those of the comparable sales. The County recommends a revised value of$305,200 <br /> for the subject property. <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> • GIS Ma <br />