Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-26-2003-ws2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 02-26-2003
>
Agenda - 02-26-2003-ws2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 9:08:13 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/26/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
ws2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030226
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recycling or hazardous waste collections. It is economically impractical to continue to <br />raise landfill tipping fees and assume the revenue will follow as eventually all privately <br />controlled waste will find it advantageous to leave. <br />The bridge financing mechanism should not be so small as to leave the Department in a <br />fiscal hole from which it will have to dig itself out using the subsequently selected <br />permanent financing mechanism. There will be still be landfill income that will partly <br />support operations in combination with this proposed bridge financing mechanism, but <br />that will not be enough. In addition, the SWAB believes the bridge financing mechanism <br />should, to the extent practicable, meet the guiding principles. <br />There appear to be three basic financing options from which a hybrid involving any <br />combination of the three could be used to supplement current sources of Departmental <br />income between FY 2003-04 and when the permanent financing mechanism is adopted. <br />Those include: <br />1. A property tax increase where the Board of Orange County Commissioners earmarked <br />a certain portion of the general tax revenues for solid waste management for a year. <br />2. Creation of special solid waste tax districts where the tax levied in each district <br />reflected, to a certain degree, the level of service provided within it. <br />3. Development of availability fees in which each member of each class of system user is <br />charged according to the services they have available. In the short run case of bridge <br />financing, the availability fee could be levied on two to four residential classes of system <br />users. <br />The SWAB was not able to provide a single recommendation from among these bridge <br />financing mechanisms, but it does urge the Board and Manager to use at least one or <br />some combination of funding options to provide adequate solid waste program funding <br />until a permanent, stable funding source can be put in place. <br />In its deliberations over solid waste financing, the SWAB received considerable technical <br />assistance in development of financial models from UNC's Environmental Finance <br />Center, especially Jeff Hughes and Joe Cook. A presentation by Prince William County's <br />Solid Waste Director Tom Smith informed the SWAB about this innovative model. The <br />Orange County Solid Waste staff provided additional information about the solid waste <br />budget and the waste reduction plan that also helped the SWAB in its deliberations. <br />Finally, the SWAB was also able to draw on the work done by the Alternate Finance <br />Committee during the tenure of the Landfill Owners Group through 1999. <br />--end executive summary -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.