Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-26-2003-ws2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 02-26-2003
>
Agenda - 02-26-2003-ws2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 9:08:13 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:44:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/26/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
ws2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030226
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The SWAB also realizes that such a system of financing is a radical departure from the <br />current approach where 90% of revenue is from tipping fees and the other 10% from a <br />combination of recycling sales, mulch sales, state grants for tires and white goods and <br />interest on the reserve fund. Establishing a new system with all Orange County property <br />owners pre-paying solid waste fees would likely take two years to implement as it did in <br />Prince William County Virginia. <br />In addition to the considerable public debate required for such a fee, there are technical <br />complexities of determining the level of fee to be paid by each class of users, especially <br />the variable commercial sector. Thorough integration of operations and data of the Tax <br />Assessor, Revenue Collections, Information Services and Land Records/G.LS. <br />Departments will be necessary for success. There are also significant public education <br />and outreach efforts involved in consideration of such a fee structure. <br />The SWAB supports the prepaid comprehensive service fee as it most closely matches <br />the overall set of guiding principles endorsed over the past year including: <br />• Endorsement of the Solid Waste Reduction Plan goals and framework, <br />• Capturing revenues from non-profit properties, as they too generate solid waste, <br />• Using the existing tax collection system to collect solid waste revenues, <br />• Leveling fees or taxes to prevent yearly fluctuations, <br />• Creating equity among classes of system users such that revenues collected reflect <br />services received, <br />• Requiring property owners, rather than occupants to pay the fee or tax, <br />• Creation of dedicated and restricted reserve funds for equipment and landfill closure <br />are prudent policy, <br />• Maintaining a healthy fund balance of a minimum of 12% of the annual budget, <br />• Viewing the fund and the operation as an integrated whole, rather than disparate parts <br />to be completely separated functionally and fiscally. <br />The SWAB recognizes thatthere are significant legal issues to be resolved before such a <br />fee could be considered. Even if it is deemed legal for Orange County to enact the fee, <br />there would be significant technical and political work involved in implementing such a <br />fee that would likely take the same two years it took elsewhere. Consequently, the <br />SWAB recommends that the Board and Manager develop a bridge financing mechanism <br />to get the Solid Waste Management Department through the next two years while the <br />permanent financial plan is being developed. <br />The SWAB discussed in detail the use of availability fees to fund parts of the budget that <br />provide specific services to specific sectors such as weekly curbside recycling in the <br />incorporated areas or biweekly curbside in unincorporated areas. District taxes were <br />considered, as was a general property tax increase earmarked for solid waste. A <br />combination of those fees and taxes was also reviewed. The SWAB ruled out sending a <br />bill to each local government for services rendered and allowing them to find a payment <br />method of their choosing or direct payment by each government for services received. <br />Also deliberated and eliminated were voluntary user fees for non-landfill services such as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.