Orange County NC Website
203 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 1 MEETING MINUTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 OCTOBER 1,2025 <br /> 4 REGULAR MEETING <br /> 5 <br /> 6 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamar Proctor(Chair) Cheeks Township, Chris Johnston (Vice-Chair) Hillsborough <br /> 7 Township, Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township Representative; Beth Bronson, At-Large <br /> 8 Representative; Venkat Yendapalli, Cedar Grove Township Representative; Jonah <br /> 9 Garson, At-Large Representative; Whitney Watson, At-Large Representative; Liz Kalies, <br /> 10 Chapel Hill Township Representative; Charity Kirk, At-Large Representative. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 MEMBERS ABSENT: Delores Bailey, At-Large Representative; Steve Kaufmann, Bingham Township <br /> 13 Representative; Meg Millard, Little River Township Representative. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Christopher Sandt, County Engineer; Patrick <br /> 16 Mallett, Deputy Director—Development Services; Taylor Perschau, Current Planning <br /> 17 Manager; Jack Moran, Planner 1 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 OTHERS PRESENT: Al Carnevalo, Donna Crowder, Danielle Cabral, Don Sever, Joshua Reinke, Beth Trahos, David <br /> 20 Barcal, Cathy Owens, Hope Haywood, Stephanie Waller <br /> 21 <br /> 22 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL <br /> 23 <br /> 24 Lamar Proctor: Okay. All right, I'm Lamar Proctor. I'm the chair of the planning board. We're going to bring this <br /> 25 meeting to order. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 ****** <br /> 28 <br /> 29 AGENDA ITEM 7: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT(CONDITIONAL DISTRICT)(CONTINUED) <br /> 30 <br /> 31 Lamar Proctor: In terms of discussion and any additional questions for the applicant does—so kind of blurred <br /> 32 from chair comments into Agenda Item 7, but so beginning Agenda Item 7,yes, Statler? <br /> 33 <br /> 34 Statler Gilfillen: Just as a question, if this is only one person with 3 minutes speaking, is that too much of an <br /> 35 interruption since they were not heard last time or able to speak last time? <br /> 36 <br /> 37 Lamar Proctor: Well— <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Statler Gilfillen: Maybe we let them have flexibility to be heard this time? <br /> 40 <br /> 41 Lamar Proctor: I- <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Chris Johnston: So the only thing I would say is the public comment was during the time that we had,and at this <br /> 44 point, really what we're talking about is the board having the discussion with the additional time. <br /> 45 The point of order last time was that we needed additional time in order to review the <br /> 46 documentation and then make a decision on this. Now,what I will say in potentially support of <br /> 47 Statler's argument is there does appear to be some changes that have been made to the <br /> 48 presentation in regards to changes to the conditions that are being presented. So I would argue <br /> 49 that we leave it as is and not necessarily have additional public comment. Additional items have <br /> 50 been submitted, and I think you could accept those as—I mean that's, I guess that's another <br /> 51 question. Is that additional public comment at that point? <br /> 52 <br /> 53 Lamar Proctor: Well,what I'll— <br /> 54 <br />