Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
201 <br /> Approved 10.1.25 <br /> 1809 specific conditions, but I don't think you can do this conditional come back whenever. I mean, this <br /> 1810 is the application. We have to make a decision on it. <br /> 1811 <br /> 1812 Chris Johnston: I'm going to make a proposal and if it gets voted down,then it gets voted down and we move from <br /> 1813 there. <br /> 1814 <br /> 1815 Lamar Proctor: Okay. <br /> 1816 <br /> 1817 Chris Johnston: Does that serve the purpose? <br /> 1818 <br /> 1819 Lamar Proctor: Yes. <br /> 1820 <br /> 1821 Chris Johnston: Okay. I'm going to butcher it. I make a motion that the application as stated follows the statement <br /> 1822 of consistency, the Planning Board finds that it is within the statement of consistency and should <br /> 1823 be moved forward with the conditions as proposed with no additional conditions or changes. <br /> 1824 <br /> 1825 Lamar Proctor: Okay. So that's a motion to adopt the statement of consistency in Attachment 6 and recommend <br /> 1826 approval to the Board of County Commissioners. <br /> 1827 <br /> 1828 Chris Johnston: With the conditions as stated,yes. <br /> 1829 <br /> 1830 Lamar Proctor: With the conditions as stated in the application. Do I have a second? <br /> 1831 <br /> 1832 Whitney Watson: Second. <br /> 1833 <br /> 1834 Lamar Proctor: Second. All in favor of approval? <br /> 1835 <br /> 1836 MOTION BY Chris Johnston to approve the statement of consistency. Seconded by Whitney Watson. <br /> 1837 <br /> 1838 MOTION FAILS 4-4:Venkat Yendapalli, Statler Gilfillen, Beth Bronson, and Delores Bailey opposed. <br /> 1839 <br /> 1840 Lamar Proctor: I'm sorry, how many approval? So, one, two,three, four.And then for those who say nay, I think <br /> 1841 you're required to state your reasons as to why is that right, Cy? <br /> 1842 <br /> 1843 Cy Stober: That's requested,yes. <br /> 1844 <br /> 1845 Lamar Proctor: All right,so all those against? All right. So, Delores,you want to state your reasons as to why it's <br /> 1846 not consistent. <br /> 1847 <br /> 1848 Delores Bailey: I do not feel like this is consistent with rural character of this area. <br /> 1849 <br /> 1850 Lamar Proctor: Okay. Thank you. Beth? <br /> 1851 <br /> 1852 Beth Bronson: I just,yeah,the density does not fit the rural character. I don't find that the complete testing for <br /> 1853 the rezoning application as it stands is sufficient enough to move forward with a recommendation. <br /> 1854 <br /> 1855 Lamar Proctor: All right. Who else was a no? Statler. <br /> 1856 <br /> 1857 Statler Gilfillen: Professional architect who's dealt with these types of issues at the university level and as a <br /> 1858 licensed architect who has taught for years at universities, planning and development and design, <br /> 1859 1 do not believe that this layout is in the best interest consistent with what the Planning Board <br /> 1860 should be approving. <br /> 1861 <br /> 1862 Lamar Proctor: Okay. And Venkat? <br /> 1863 <br />