Browse
Search
2025_10_28 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_10_28 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2025 4:52:55 PM
Creation date
11/11/2025 6:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/28/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:6E3F16AO-BC7B-4F9D-B4E9-B4OC6D98AOA9 <br /> Correcting the measurements of the deck. <br /> • These changes would result in a revised value from$332,700 to $306,100. <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> • GIS Map <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $306,100 <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against ... <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Kenneth C. Barnett Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 915 Coker Drive Parcel ID or Abstract � 9788911357 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on a comparable sale. <br /> Current Assessed Value $638,000 ounty Opinion $598,500 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:23PM Appellant Opinion $500,000 <br /> County Representative Heidi Whetzel Board Decision $598,500 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • 903 Coker Drive sold for$545,000 and the subject property has not been updated. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is located at 915 Coker Drive in Chapel Hill. A site visit was conducted <br /> on October 23,2025. The exterior of the dwelling appeared to be in average condition,with an <br /> actual year built of 1968 and an effective year built of 1980. The interior could not be <br /> inspected, as there was no response at the door; however, a hang tag was left on site. Based on <br /> a review of neighborhood sales and construction grades, the subject dwelling is of inferior <br /> construction quality compared to the B-10 graded homes included in the analysis. The subject <br /> property is more consistent with the C+10 homes in terms of overall quality and appeal. <br /> • After review, the County recommends the following changes: <br /> • Changing the grade from a B-10 to C+10. <br /> • Correcting the story height from 1 story to 1.25 story. <br /> • Relabeling the finished attic area(ATTF) on the sketch to US 15 to accurately reflect the upper- <br /> level finished space. <br /> • These adjustments result in a revised value from$638,000 to$598,500. <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> 0 Comp photos listed in the analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.