2025_10_14 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID:40462423-CB48-41E6-989B-17C70C3813D3 Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is a 792 square foot,one story townhome developed and built in 2019 by Habitat for Humanity of Orange County in the Waterstone Community. • Based on the restrictions put in place by Habitat to buy and sell the property, The County recommends reducing the value of the residence and land by 25%resulting in a revised total value from$249,400 to $187,100. • Photo of subject • GIS Map • Current Property Record Card • Proposed Property Record Card Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $187,100 Made the motion Richal Vanhook Seconded the motion Saru Salvi Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against Property Identification: Property Owner Chelsea Marie Pavalonis Appellant(if different) Property Address 201 Pink Dogwood Lane Parcel ID or Abstract 19825656213 Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on comparable sales and the condition of the home. Current Assessed Value $432,100 ounty Opinion $432,100 Time of Hearin 2:21PM Appellant Opinion $305,560 County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $424,800 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant submitted a comparable sale from early 2025 and provided several active or pending listings as supporting evidence with this appeal. The appellant also submitted two 2024 sales. The appellant states that the home has several issues relating to condition and provided photos as supporting evidence. • The appellant also submitted several color photos as supporting evidence with their 2025 informal appeal. These photos were saved and uploaded to this formal appeal. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is a 0.18-acre tract improved with a 2,760-square-foot single-family residence located in the Ashbury Subdivision in Mebane. The appellant submitted several comparable sales, as well as active and pending listings, as supporting evidence. However, most of the submitted sales occurred in 2025 and were not considered by the County, as they took place after the reappraisal date of January 1,2025. The appellant also included 1203 Montreux Drive as a comparable sale; although this transaction occurred in 2024,the property is located outside the subject neighborhood in Alamance County and was therefore not reviewed by the County.