Orange County NC Website
1 AGENDA ITEM 6: CASE: A-4-25 - To review and hold a quasi-judicial hearing for a Variance request (Case 2 <br />Number BA25-0002). 3 <br /> 4 <br /> Request has been submitted by property owners Michael and Tammy McHale. The applicants 5 <br />have applied for a Variance to allow for a 30’ front building setback (a 10’ reduction in the 6 <br />required 40’) from the Eno Cemetery Road right-of-way. The .47-acre site is located on 7 <br />Orange County PIN 9857-65-5080, at 4310 Eno Cemetery Road, Cedar Grove NC, 27231, and 8 <br />lies within the Cedar Grove Township of Orange County. 9 <br /> 10 <br />Jack Moran: All right. Good evening, Board. I'll just skip ahead to Agenda Item 6, the variance request that is 11 <br />before you tonight, Case No. BA25-0002. The applicant is David Cates, on behalf of the property 12 <br />owners, James and Tammy McHale. Like I said, this is a variance request for an unaddressed 13 <br />parcel off of Eno Cemetery Road, which as many of you may know is adjacent to Lake Orange. 14 <br />This one is kind of unique to the other ones that you may be familiar with. It's a variance request 15 <br />for the front setback, as opposed to the reservoir buffer, which I think is what the previous ones 16 <br />have been for. So, moving into the UDO sections that are affected, 6.13.4 and 4.2.9 give us the 17 <br />reservoir setbacks. There is a provision for an administrative reduction in those setbacks with 18 <br />coordination with the County Engineer and Environmental Health. There are some restrictions for 19 <br />septic size, limiting it to 20,000 square feet, and then the provision of a maximum of four 20 <br />bedrooms. So, with those allowances met, staff determined a 75-foot reservoir setback would be 21 <br />appropriate. And that was working with County Engineer and Environmental Health. With that 22 <br />reduction, the applicant is still requesting a variance from the minimum required 40-foot front 23 <br />setback to 30 feet. So, here are all of the properties around Lake Orange, the ones that are within 24 <br />the septic setback and the reservoir setback there. As I'm sure you're familiar, there's a lot of 25 <br />nonconforming structures out there. You've heard a lot of variances. This one is that orange 26 <br />arrow, if you can see it, just at the tip of the peninsula there. It's kind of a unique lot, just in the 27 <br />size. It's one of the smallest lots around Lake Orange. It's just point-four-seven acres in size. So, 28 <br />even with the administrative reduction through the ordinance, and working with the County 29 <br />Engineer and Environmental Health for that reduction in the reservoir setback for the septic and the 30 <br />structure, the front setback would still come into play. Here is the site plan, which I will ask David 31 <br />to come up and talk you through further the rationale behind the variance and what you're seeing 32 <br />here on the site plan. If you have any questions about that part of the presentation? Otherwise, I'll 33 <br />ask David to come up here. 34 <br /> 35 <br />Beth Bronson: Could you just clarify? You said two bedrooms are being requested, but four is permissible? Is 36 <br />that what you said? 37 <br /> 38 <br />Jack Moran: Yes. So, the administrative reduction, four would be the maximum, two is what's proposed for this. 39 <br /> 40 <br />Leon Meyers: Any other questions, Board members? 41 <br /> 42 <br />Beth Bronson: This is an acquired lot adjacent to the other owned lot? 43 <br /> 44 <br />Jack Moran: Yes. They own both of them. 45 <br /> 46 <br />Beth Bronson: Thank you. 47 <br /> 48 <br />David Cates: Good evening. I don't know if it was stated, but this lot was originally created in 1976 as part of the 49 <br />creation of all the lots around the lake; so, that's what allowed it to take advantage of the 50 <br />3