11.12.25 BOA Agenda Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

David Cates: Just, it happens, in this case, that they own both ones. I remember discussing it, but I don't 1 remember the exact reason. 2 3 Greg Niemiroski: I think the fact that they're existing as of the date they are, also would be affected. 4 5 David Cates: Yes. 6 7 Greg Niemiroski: If you recombine, it's now a new effective date, subject to all the current standards. 8 9 Beth Bronson: That makes total sense. 10 11 David Cates: That's a better answer. 12 13 Beth Bronson: All right. 14 15 David Cates: Thank you. 16 17 Leon Meyers: Okay, I believe that's it, then. All right. Board members, thoughts, or discussion, or motion? 18 19 Beth Bronson: You want to discuss how Lake Orange is problematic? 20 21 Jack Moran: We do have just one more thing. Well, first, thank you, Greg, for that explanation. 22 23 Greg Niemiroski: I hope it's correct. 24 25 Jack Moran: It is correct, thank you. Forgot to mention at the start the existing development part of the 26 administrative reduction. And then, as we move into the findings of facts, which you will then have 27 a motion to approve or deny, from Section 2.10 of the ordinance, findings of fact, which you can 28 also find in Attachment 5 of your packet, the four criteria for the variance you will review and then 29 make your vote on whether it's appropriate. 30 31 Kyle Myers: Can you just repeat what you just said, the last two sentences. 32 33 Jack Moran: Yes. Section 5 of your packet, you'll find the findings of fact. Within the findings of fact, there are 34 four criteria for the variance, and then you'll make a vote on the motion, whether you find that the 35 application has met them. 36 37 Leon Meyers: So, a first motion would be the findings listed on Page 68, is that right? James, help us here. 38 39 Beth Bronson: Yes. 40 41 James Bryan: Yes. So, this case is a little bit easier because you don't have competing facts, but the first thing 42 you would do is the findings of facts. Yes, but, so, those are just describing them. I don't think 43 those are actually facts. 44 45 Beth Bronson: They would be in the application. Maybe the next page. 46 47 James Bryan: So, where they have it, it just says application package, which is just very broad, the facts are as 48 you heard them today. If you wanted to do something contrary, you could say, call out something 49 that was not substantial evidence, something that was not material, or call out something that was 50 8