Browse
Search
Minutes 10-14-2025-Joint Meeting w/Fire Department
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Minutes 10-14-2025-Joint Meeting w/Fire Department
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2025 8:01:07 AM
Creation date
11/11/2025 7:57:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/14/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-14-2025; 1 - Discussion Topics-Presentation from Orange County Chiefs’ Association
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 2 - Orange County Land Use Plan 2050 – Board Request for Additional Information
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 3 - Affordable Housing Advisory Board - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 4 - Opioid Advisory Committee – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 5 - Parks and Recreation Council - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda for October 14, 2025 Joint Meeting with Chiefs' Association and Regular Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
45 <br /> Slide #33 <br /> Communicating About New Projects with Developers <br /> • There is limited capacity for development projects that will use a large <br /> amount of water/sewer,at this time,especially those outside of town limits <br /> or non-contiguous to town limits <br /> • Utilities will evaluate potential available capacity for projects at the pre- <br /> development meeting, but capacity is not guaranteed until a water and <br /> Sewer Extension Contract is executed (construction drawings) <br /> • There are options for developer cost sharing and/or modifying scheduled <br /> water/sewer improvements to keep pace with development demand <br /> through conditional zoning and development agreements with developers <br /> • Properties that want to develop immediately,located on the edges of town <br /> or outside of town may look to evaluate cost/benefit of developing in the <br /> County with traditional large lot well/septic vs.annexation into the town <br /> Slide #34 <br /> Financial Constraints <br /> Population v.Employee Orow[ft 2004-2025 <br /> Water 8 Sewer Operations <br /> • High utility bills,particularly for out-of- q <br /> town customers <br /> • Tight operating ratios—cost of operations ��� °° °�' - " W" <br /> and debt service increasing faster than —F� ••• —�uei1 eix•••• <br /> revenues <br /> Debt Service Coverage <br /> • Significant CIP needs-$50m by FY32— <br /> not including any plant upgrades <br /> • Adding significant customers may increase m� �, pffi o� p• <br /> revenues, but also increases need for <br /> system improvements =M•mmox m� ^M°�. *°° '° <br /> Chair Bedford asked if Hillsborough is below PFAS limits. <br /> Matt Efird said PFAS isn't an issue for Hillsborough because of its location and the nature <br /> of development around the upper Eno. <br /> Bryant Green agreed and explained that Hillsborough is at the top of the basin and has so <br /> far not been close to the threshold for PFAS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.