Browse
Search
Minutes 10-14-2025-Joint Meeting w/Fire Department
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Minutes 10-14-2025-Joint Meeting w/Fire Department
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2025 8:01:07 AM
Creation date
11/11/2025 7:57:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/14/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-14-2025; 1 - Discussion Topics-Presentation from Orange County Chiefs’ Association
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 2 - Orange County Land Use Plan 2050 – Board Request for Additional Information
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 3 - Affordable Housing Advisory Board - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 4 - Opioid Advisory Committee – Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda 10-14-2025; 5 - Parks and Recreation Council - Appointments Discussion
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
Agenda for October 14, 2025 Joint Meeting with Chiefs' Association and Regular Work Session
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-14-2025 Joint Meeting with Orange County Chiefs Association and Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
26 <br /> Slide#8 <br /> Orange County Primary Service Area <br /> • Orange County does not operate a water system and no <br /> longer operates a sewerage system <br /> — (former Efland system was transferred to the City of <br /> Mebane in the early/mid 2010s). <br /> • Idea for Orange County Primary Service Areas(PSA) <br /> was for Orange County to coordinate with providers to <br /> operate systems within the County's PSAs. <br /> — Former agreements with the Cities of Mebane and <br /> Durham <br /> • Agreements now defunct <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH C.AROLINA <br /> Perdita Holtz emphasized that Orange County does not operate a water system and no <br /> longer operates a sewer system. She explained that the idea for Orange County's primary service <br /> area was for Orange County to coordinate and partner with providers to operate systems within <br /> the county's primary service area, so there were former agreements with the cities of Mebane and <br /> Durham, but those agreements are now defunct. <br /> Commissioner Fowler asked why those agreements are defunct. <br /> In Durham's case, Perdita Holtz explained that there was a sewer system study done in <br /> the mid-2000s that determined that sewer expansion into the Eno Economic Development District <br /> (EDD) was not going to be financially feasible because of capacity constraints further down the <br /> line within Durham. In Mebane's case, she said Mebane is currently covering the areas that were <br /> included in the service agreement, like the Buckhorn EDD, and took over the former Efland system <br /> that was Orange County's. She said it is understood that they will continue to serve those areas, <br /> so the service agreement was sunset. <br /> Commissioner Carter asked if these agreements timed out or if formal notice of withdrawal <br /> from the agreement was required. <br /> Perdita Holtz said these agreements had termination dates that went into effect unless the <br /> agreements were renewed. <br /> Chair Bedford asked if her memory is correct that Orange County Planning staff has <br /> recently contacted Durham and confirmed that they still do not have capacity. <br /> Perdita Holtz said there were some attempts in 2020 to work with Durham, but efforts <br /> fizzled out. <br /> On a related note, Cy Stober shared that Mebane has initiated a study with Orange- <br /> Alamance's Water System to look into consolidating the two systems. He said the report from that <br /> study will be delivered sometime in the next year. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he recalls that Durham was not interested in pursuing an <br /> agreement. <br /> Chair Bedford agreed. <br /> Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked if leadership in Durham has changed since the last <br /> attempts. <br /> Cy Stober said there were staff changes, and council members have changed as well. He <br /> said that Bryant Green was with the City of Durham at the time, so he may be able to share more <br /> information. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.