Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID: 11D3D156-724F-4E90-9FB3-D8A787A93FBD <br /> • Based on the physical attributes of the property, The County recommends increasing the -20% <br /> land adjustment to-40%for access,topography,road easement and powerline easement <br /> resulting in a reduction in value from$212,000 to$159,000. <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Current property record card <br /> • Proposed property record card <br /> County Recommendation: <br /> • Increasing the-20%land adjustment to -40%for access, topography, road easement and <br /> owerline easement resulting in a reduction in value from$212,000 to$159,000. <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: 1 $159,000 <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Tony Blake <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Paul N. Palombo Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Addr�TL <br /> 1.47 acres on Pond View Parcel ID or Abstract 9845366778 <br /> ne <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on percentage of increase. <br /> Current Assessed Value $221,800 ounty Opinion $148,000 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:59 PM Appellant Opinion $97,370 <br /> County Representative Kelly Wells Board Decision $148,000 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The 30%median increase based on the NC Association of County Commissioners from 2019- <br /> 2024. <br /> • The property tax value increase is inflated based on past increases. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject parcel is 11.47 acres of land with a small shed on Lebanon <br /> Road in Efland. <br /> • North Carolina General Statutes put the burden of proof on the property <br /> owner to show that a tax assessment is inaccurate. A change in assessment <br /> will be considered only if the owner can demonstrate that the assessed <br /> value is more or less than market value as of January 1,2025, or that it is <br /> inconsistent with assessments of similar properties. Assessments cannot be <br /> appealed based on the percentage of increase/decrease in value OR the <br /> taxpayer's ability to pay the tax. <br />