Browse
Search
2025_10_21 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_10_21 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2025 7:55:51 PM
Creation date
11/6/2025 7:54:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID: E4EODF38-5118-4696-AD5B-F7C5C7741 FOF <br /> • I reviewed the submitted appraisal and the findings as follows: Comparables#1 and#2 are <br /> from NBC 7048, in which the land is valued through Ac_9 acreage pricing table. The two <br /> comps are not in an established neighborhood like the subject, and the only strong comparison <br /> is the size. However,they are all considered to be custom homes with similar locations. The <br /> land appears to be the largest issue between the appraisal and the County's value. Based on the <br /> appraisal, the subject's land is valued at 29%of its appraisal value, indicated from the sales <br /> comparison approach. If we consider the sales prices of Comps. #1 and#2 at the appraisals <br /> 29%for land value, the land value will exceed$600,000 in both sales. <br /> • I created an analysis of the sold properties within the subject's neighborhood to illustrate the <br /> land and buildings values at a price per square foot that includes all attachments. Yard items <br /> were broken out. <br /> • I took the two sales in the analysis that are also in the appraisal along with the remaining two <br /> properties in the appraisal, added their sales prices per square foot based on county records and <br /> divided them by the four properties yielding an average price per square foot of$372.86. and <br /> when applied to the subject would calculate to an appraised value of$1,459,747. <br /> • The County suggests adjusting the land-15%based on plat information of RCD(Resource <br /> Conservation District),that restricts development. This will create a new value of$1,482,100, <br /> which is approximately 1.5%higher than the appellant's appraisal. <br /> • Analysis <br /> • Map <br /> • Plat <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> • Photo <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $1,482,100 <br /> Made the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Jeffrey Bachar Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 422 Tinkerbell Road Parcel ID or Abstract 19799643794 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based upon perceived overvaluation and comparable <br /> properties. <br /> Current Assessed Value $511,900 ounty Opinion $498,100 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:50 PM Appellant Opinion $427,840 <br /> County Representative Jimmy Milliken Board Decision $498,100 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.