Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
47 <br /> Proposed UDO Text Amendments <br /> Elimination of "Sliding <br /> Scale" - Section 4.2 <br /> • Origin of table is unknown, not Collsinblack OT tothsU Eno <br /> statute-based, created in mid-1990s 3.6 <br /> 2.9 #2.885 <br /> in response to WPOD enforcement 12.585 <br /> 2.T X0.6 12,4E7 <br /> 2.0 iio14.9 12.232 <br /> 2.6,or 11.979 <br /> 1 AV i1.211.709 <br /> • Originally intended to deal with non- c3 #1d 11,421 <br /> 2.2 11 5 11.115 <br /> 2.1118 10.794 <br /> conforming lots from density and 5G 113.060 2.0 126 10AM <br /> 02 13,234 1.9 12-2 10,097 <br /> impervious area perspectives h 13,51 �1, 124 'x.723 <br /> '..7 0 0 13,512 1.7 12.6 6.331 <br /> 46 b5 13,6' 1,6 125 1.921 <br /> 4.5 7.0 1: 1 13.0 8.494 <br /> • With new legislation, keeping the 4.4 7l 3.861 ', 132 7.588 <br /> 4 3 �4 13,881 1.3 13-d 7,F,88 <br /> 4.r 7 6 13MA 116 7.1014 <br /> sliding scale would give a "double 78 13,936 1.# 13-8 E,612 <br /> 1-3,934 1.0 IJ 6.tA8 <br /> bump" to impervious allowances 2 13,36 0.9 1 5f7 <br /> ?i1 H- 1:5,:)17A 0.33 id d <br /> B 6 13,851 0.7 t4.9 .,,752 <br /> H 8 1'3,130[r 0.6 14.H :i.a6H <br /> • Table was difficult to understand/use 36 13,721 0.5 15.6 B7 <br /> 6:3 <br /> 94 13,512 6.3 1 15.4 2,61 <br /> 9 6 13.382 0.2 15.8 1,359 <br /> • Replaced with 12% impervious cap 40 <br /> for all non-conforming lots <br /> • Provides clarity/consistencyfor non- ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> conforming lots <br />