Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-17-2003-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 02-17-2003
>
Agenda - 02-17-2003-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 8:56:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:44:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/17/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030217
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-003 Major Subdivision and Rural Buffer Notification and Flexible Development Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r _.. <br />7 <br />1. Orange County Subdivision Regulations Text Amendments <br />a. Amend Section III-D-1 to require notification of adjacent property owners, <br />posting of a sign on property proposed for major subdivision <br />development and a Neighborhood Information Meeting for all Concept <br />Plan applications for major subdivision development including the <br />Rural Buffer. <br />Craig Benedict explained some maps. Presently there are certain processes <br />for subdivisions. Before a major subdivision comes forward in Orange County's <br />jurisdiction outside of the rural buffer, there is a neighborhood information meeting. The <br />purpose of this amendment is to standardize what occurs in both sections of the County, <br />so there is equity in the rural buffer and Orange County jurisdiction areas. The <br />suggested amendment is a sign on the property when major subdivisions come forward. <br />The sign will notify people of the Planning Board meeting to consider the subdivision. <br />Chair Jacobs asked about where the sign has to be located and Craig <br />Benedict said they will be visible from the public road. <br />There was no public comment on this item. <br />b. Delete the entire text of Section III-D-2 and reserve for future use. <br />c. Amend Section III-D-3 to require Class A Special Use Permit in addition to <br />Preliminary Plat Approval for Major Subdivisions creating 20 or more <br />lots or involving 20 or more acres. <br />Craig Benedict said that, presently, a major subdivision goes through the <br />process of a concept plan where developers bring in a conventional plan and a flexible <br />option plan. This is brought forward to the Planning Board and the board decides which <br />plan is the best. The developer then brings forward a preliminary plat. The Planning <br />Board makes a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners and the County <br />Commissioners make the decision. The purpose of the new process is to be able to <br />more comprehensively review the preliminary plat part of the subdivision and put it in a <br />special use process. He described the different standards for subdivisions. The <br />Planning Board is discussing the traffic impact study for subdivisions. Presently, a <br />traffic impact study is required for an 80-lot or above subdivision. This could be <br />changed, depending on which road the subdivision is proposing. Other issues include <br />fire protection, mitigation for resource damage, drainage and storm water management, <br />solid waste management, irrigation, open space maintenance, Crime Prevention <br />Through Environmental Design, etc. These aspects can be added to the subdivision <br />review process during the preliminary plat stage and the special use class A stage. <br />Before final adoption, there needs to be adequate public input. <br />The County Commissioners and the Planning Board have discussed the <br />threshold for the special use process being 20 lots. It could also be 20 acres. <br />Commissioner Gordon asked if Craig Benedict was recommending all of the <br />standards if the project is large enough. Craig Benedict said that they have discussed <br />this with the Planning Board and the County Commissioners in detail. They thought that <br />it would be best for this meeting to have the all inclusive list of the different options and <br />then pare this down or have a phase one or a phase two investigation. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that this would probably need some fine tuning <br />because that is a lot of standards for a small developer. She is especially interested in <br />groundwater availability. Some of the standards should apply to all subdivisions. <br />Commissioner Carey said that if the threshold would be 20 acres rather than <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.