Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-17-2003-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 02-17-2003
>
Agenda - 02-17-2003-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 8:56:52 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:44:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/17/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030217
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-003 Major Subdivision and Rural Buffer Notification and Flexible Development Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Rachel Preston said that the North Carolina Landscape Contractors <br />Registration Board is the licensing board and anyone doing landscaping has to have a <br />license and has to go through a rigorous exam. She asked for some type of reference <br />to this. She said that this should be enforced. Craig Benedict said that he agreed that <br />we need to look at the landscape standards. He said that they have added the concepts <br />of xeri-scaping, which is using native trees and low water use trees to reduce overall <br />water consumption. <br />Rachel Preston said that there are nurseries in the area that provide plants <br />native to Orange County and non-native plants that are not invasive. She suggested <br />putting in phrases that encourage people to purchase plants within Orange County - <br />both native and non-native. <br />Commissioner Brown asked about setbacks from creeks. Craig Benedict <br />said that storm water, drainage, and erosion control refer back to the stream buffer <br />requirements that are in other sections of the code. There are very good standards in <br />this area. There is a minimum of 50 feet on either side of the stream. In the Neuse <br />River Basin, there are additional requirements. The hope is to use these rules in the <br />Cape Fear Basin. <br />Chair Jacobs made reference to landscaping and Orange County becoming <br />a non-attainment area for air quality. He said that maybe we could take a leadership <br />role with landscaping requirements to be more energy efficient. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the ordinance will actually protect open space <br />in terms of design. She asked how this ordinance would affect design in terms of open <br />space. Craig Benedict said that in the analysis, we define primary and secondary <br />conservation areas. Primary conservation areas are stream buffers, wildlife corridors, <br />etc. Secondary conservation areas could be a wooded area or an open field. This <br />amendment will ask developers to do a more elaborate analysis of an inventory of a <br />native tree area and an open space analysis. <br />Commissioner Brown said that a smaller developer is going to need <br />assistance in understanding what this says. <br />Craig Benedict said that there is an example that will be used for the general <br />public and property owners that is called Above and Beyond. It will be air photos <br />showing how subdivisions fit or do not fit into the landscape. Also, it will show what <br />happens over time to inappropriately placed open space areas. This was a very good <br />study of things that happened in the Vermont/New Hampshire area. <br />Discussion ensued about open space design in subdivisions. <br />Chair Gooding-Ray said that she did not see anything about light pollution. <br />Craig Benedict said that it is in the ordinance. He said that there is a Dark Skies <br />initiative coming forward. <br />There was no public comment on this item. <br />d. Amend Section IV-B-10.B to allow all Flexible Development options except <br />the village option in the Rural Buffer. <br />Craig Benedict said that this amendment is to allow flexible development <br />within the rural buffer. He referred to the County map. Presently, in the rural buffer, <br />there is only the conventional plan allowed. The amendment is that any developer <br />within the rural buffer would provide two plans. In the rural buffer, it is suggested that <br />flexible development standards be identical to all other areas in County jurisdiction. <br />Developers could either bring in an estate option (four-acre lots) or a conservation <br />cluster option, which would be at least 33% open space. This is an effort to have the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.