Browse
Search
2025_09_25 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_09_25 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 10:38:57 AM
Creation date
10/20/2025 10:35:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/25/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
2025_09_25 BOER Agenda
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Equalization and Review\Agendas\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:3F8FF723-F74B-4D5B-A034-43FF8E859565 <br /> Voted Against ... <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Lauren Bowers Brown Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 7206 Sed ewood Road I Parcel ID or Abstract 19880588279 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on the condition of the home. <br /> Current Assessed Value $918,900 County Opinion $851,000 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:49 PM Appellant Opinion $825,000 <br /> County Representative Louise Benson- Board Decision $851,000 <br /> Lochner <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The Appellant filed a formal appeal on 7/27/2025. The Appellant stated: <br /> "The house is 35 yrs old, some maintenance has been done on the exterior,but very little on the <br /> interior. In recent years I went thru a divorce, and in 2021 a major stroke with limited mobility <br /> and the need for some in-home assistance resulting. I plan on remaining in my house and doing <br /> the needed maintenance and updating but it will be on a very gradual basis, finances and my <br /> health setting the terms. I am attaching photos documenting areas needing maintenance,and <br /> areas looking the same as when built in 1989,needing aesthetic updating. The house is not <br /> comparable to recent sales in the area." <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • On 9/12/2025 a site visit was performed by this appraiser. The taxpayer was at home and <br /> allowed access to the site along with the exterior of the home to observe grade, <br /> condition/maintenance, and construction standards. Photos were taken of the exterior and are <br /> attached. The Appellant supplied interior pictures with her appeal. <br /> • Appraiser observations and recommendations: <br /> 1. AGE: A 2025 Informal Appeal was submitted concerning condition. At that time the <br /> Effective Year Built was reduced from 1999 to the Actual Year Built of 1989. This reduced the <br /> 2025 assessed value by$45,300.No additional recommendation for reduction due to being at <br /> lowest option for effective year built. <br /> 2. CONDITION: Upon site review and photos supplied, due to lack of continued and general <br /> maintenance,physical deterioration has occurred. In particular,windows and doors are aged, <br /> the cosmetics of the home are in need of updating. It is recommended that condition should be <br /> changed from Average(26%)to Fair(32%). This would reduce the assessed value by$45,400. <br /> 3. GRADE: An appropriate grade of A+10 is in existence.No change recommended. <br /> 4. LAND: An Influence of-20%for a power line has been in existence and remains on the <br /> current assessed value. It is noted the subject also has a stream running through the property. <br /> The combination of the power line easement and the stream affects 40%of the property. A <br /> total adjustment of-25%is appropriate. This recommendation would reduce the assessed value <br /> $22,500. <br /> 6. Comper report is attached. Appellant did not address or provide sales to justify a reduction <br /> in the assessed value. Report is not for determining value, only for amenity comparison.No <br /> change is recommended based on sales. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.