Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID:CAA96AA1-7D21-4D46-9A3F-10F230AD80FA <br /> My house is 1,190 square feet with a .02-acre lot size and is a Grade C quality level. The <br /> comparable house has twice the lot size I have and a higher quality level yet my per square foot <br /> price is $274,6218. I'm not sure the reason for the comps lot size to be twice the size of mine <br /> but they are both valued at$200,000. That puts me at a significant disadvantage when I go to <br /> sell my home. <br /> • In addition,in the beginning of the year Zillow and Trulia realty websites both had my home <br /> valued at$311,200 without knowing it was a Grade C quality. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a 1,190 square foot townhome with 2 bedrooms and 2& 1/2 baths built <br /> in 2010 and located in Chapel Hill. <br /> • The sale used in the appeal occurred February 2025 and is out of the scope of the revaluation <br /> period and cannot be considered. The County recommends no change in value. <br /> • Photos of Subject <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Coun 's Proposed Value: $326,800 No Change in Value <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against ... <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Betty Jo W. Chockley Appellant if different <br /> Property Address 4112 Lynch Store Road Parcel ID or Abstract 19827398433 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request a reduction in value based on an equity analysis. <br /> Current Assessed Value $184,900 County Opinion $177,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:55 PM Appellant Opinion $105,300 <br /> County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision Continue appeal to later date <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant provided an equity analysis to support their opinion of value. The appellant <br /> states that there's a wide variance in land assessments based on their analysis. <br /> • Appellants submitted additional evidence at the meeting that has been uploaded into Spatialest. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is an improved 3.4-acre tract located at 4112 Lynch Store Road, in <br /> Mebane. The County physically inspected the property for verification and photos. The <br /> County also carefully reviewed the comparable properties submitted by the appellant, as a <br /> primary concern was the wide variance in local land assessments. Of the 34 properties <br /> submitted by the appellant,only a few were from the subject property's neighborhood code <br />