Browse
Search
Agenda 10-21-2025; 8-a - Minutes for September 16, 2025 Business Meeting and September 25, 2025 Joint Meeting with Schools
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Agenda - 10-21-2025 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 10-21-2025; 8-a - Minutes for September 16, 2025 Business Meeting and September 25, 2025 Joint Meeting with Schools
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 11:55:56 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 1:41:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/21/2025
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for October 21, 2025 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 10-21-2025 Business Meeting
ORD-2025-035-Approval of Amendments to the Orange County Code of Ordinances Section 28 – Personnel Regarding Law Enforcement Special Separation Allowance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2025
OTHER-2025-094-Memorandum of Understanding Between Orange County and Town of Hillsborough for the Solar feasibility study
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
OTHER-2025-096-Authorization for County Manager to Sign the State Bureau of Investigation Non-Criminal Justice Access Agreement
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2025
RES-2025-053-Public Hearing and Resolution for Orange County to Participate in the North Carolina commercial property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
RES-2025-054-Approval of Amendments to the Orange County Code of Ordinances Section 28
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
23 <br /> 1 appreciated Commissioner Fowler's comments and the feeling that their hands are tied. She <br /> 2 said broadband is not a regulated utility, and it is a shame. She said that this amendment is as <br /> 3 far as they can get with Lumos. She said that she supported reconvening the broadband task <br /> 4 force and pursuing any and all future options for service. She said that the County Attorney <br /> 5 described what they can and cannot contract to do. She said she had heard from many people <br /> 6 on how difficult internet access is, and this is a problem they want to solve. <br /> 7 Vice-Chair Hamilton said the comment that they are between a rock and a hard place <br /> 8 reverberates in her mind. She said part of the reason they are in this position is because <br /> 9 internet is not treated like a regulated utility. She said they have limited funds as a county to <br /> 10 meet the needs of residents. She said that she feels this is the best they can do at this time, <br /> 11 although she is not in favor of the installment plan. She would like to see Lumos receive 92% of <br /> 12 the funds when they complete all 665 homes. <br /> 13 Chair Bedford said she was in favor of the amendment. She said that if they don't spend <br /> 14 the funds, they go back to the federal government. She said that the proposal they negotiated <br /> 15 is for flexibility on the payment schedule, and it was not supported by the whole Board. She <br /> 16 said she supports moving forward with the proposal and not wait any longer. She said that the <br /> 17 county applies for many grants, but they are considered a wealthy county. She said they will <br /> 18 continue to work on it. She said they cannot put funds for broadband into the CIP, because it is <br /> 19 illegal. She said that is a General Assembly issue. She said she wanted to get 665 houses <br /> 20 served and get to work. <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said they are dealing with a multibillion-dollar company. He said <br /> 22 their gross income was $81 billion. He said whatever they are losing is pocket change. He said <br /> 23 whatever they are losing is due to their lack of due diligence. He said the company was being a <br /> 24 bully because they decided to stop working when their margin didn't hit what they wanted. He <br /> 25 said if they had, they would have had over 600 of those homes done. He said it is an insult to <br /> 26 the county, and particularly because they are affecting people's lives. He described the ways <br /> 27 lack of internet affects families. He showed three lists of addresses that would be served, those <br /> 28 that are eligible for stop-gap funding, and those that are eligible for BEAD funding. He said that <br /> 29 BEAD funding is unlikely due to the county's status as Tier 3. He said that the ARPA funds <br /> 30 belonged to the taxpayers. He offered a different proposal, "Plan B", holding Lumos <br /> 31 accountable and force them to resume work the following week and complete the project by <br /> 32 December 31, 2026. He said if Lumos did not, they would move on without them. He said they <br /> 33 could then allocate $10 million of capital funding to serve the remaining 1,183 homes. He said <br /> 34 they could use that as an incentive payment. He said if T-Mobile wants to put fiber in the <br /> 35 conduits, he has no issue, but he wants T-Mobile to be in or out. He also proposed offering an <br /> 36 additional $3 million to T-Mobile to finish the project by December 31, 2026, as a "Plan C." He <br /> 37 said they made a promise to people. He said this is an equity issue. He said that regardless of <br /> 38 the outcome, he will continue to push this issue. <br /> 39 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked for clarification of Commissioner McKee's proposed <br /> 40 plan C. <br /> 41 Commissioner McKee said they would receive a total of $9 million when all the homes <br /> 42 on the list were hooked up. <br /> 43 Commissioner Portie-Ascott asked for clarification of Commissioner McKee's proposed <br /> 44 plan B. <br /> 45 Commissioner McKee said Lumos would go back to work on Monday morning, and if <br /> 46 not, the county would inform them they were out of a job. He said the county would look for <br /> 47 another provider. <br /> 48 Commissioner Fowler said doing another RFP would put them farther behind. She said <br /> 49 she would prefer to get as much as they can from this contract and then move forward. <br /> 50 Commissioner McKee said he would have to have assurances that they would complete <br /> 51 the project by 2026. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.