Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
38 <br /> 1752 Chris Johnston: So just to confirm though, and in the interest of time and such, do we have as a board what we <br /> 1753 need in regard to this particular application? I want to make sure that we're asking the right <br /> 1754 questions and that sort of thing, but I also want to be cognizant of everyone's time and to make <br /> 1755 sure that we're not beating around a bush here. <br /> 1756 <br /> 1757 Lamar Proctor: Yeah,thank you, Chris. I think the idea is,are there additional conditions that we would seek that <br /> 1758 in addition to or modifications of the ten conditions that they have already. I was going to ask that. <br /> 1759 So,the conditions are based on the discussions with the County and from the NIM, the <br /> 1760 Neighborhood Information Meeting? Is that how these conditions were developed? <br /> 1761 <br /> 1762 Beth Bronson: Yes. <br /> 1763 <br /> 1764 Lamar Proctor: Okay. I'm just clarifying your points. Are there any other questions of that applicant, and is there <br /> 1765 any discussion that anyone has,wants to have in regard to approval or conditions? <br /> 1766 <br /> 1767 Chris Johnston: And just to confirm do we have the page number for the conditions? <br /> 1768 <br /> 1769 Lamar Proctor: I think it's Page 82 but correct me if I'm wrong. <br /> 1770 <br /> 1771 Beth Bronson: I would just like to make one comment before we kind of further this discussion, is that this been a <br /> 1772 lot of information and there has been a lot of good conversation about it. I do not know that it <br /> 1773 would be realistic to come to a decision tonight, necessarily, given that it is 9:40 and that <br /> 1774 discussions we've had on the theoretical conditions that could be in place could continue. <br /> 1775 <br /> 1776 Chris Johnston: My ask,what additional information you feel we'd be able to get before approval that we don't <br /> 1777 currently have? <br /> 1778 <br /> 1779 Beth Bronson: I would say additional time to review all the materials. <br /> 1780 <br /> 1781 Chris Johnston: The problem with saying that is the applicant went through the process and I believe Cy is going <br /> 1782 to say something like has a legal right for us to move some level on this. If there's not something <br /> 1783 that we're particularly waiting on, I would caution against asking for additional time. If there's a <br /> 1784 specific thing like we need this information before we move forward, yes, absolutely. If there is <br /> 1785 just a general sense that we need additional time to take in this data. <br /> 1786 <br /> 1787 Delores Bailey: Is the fact that they're working on a new memo or Land Use Plan.That plus the fact that this is so <br /> 1788 theoretical, is that not cause to delay the voting for zoning change? <br /> 1789 <br /> 1790 Lamar Proctor: I think that would come by way of a motion,well, Cy, can you tell me what the time limits are on <br /> 1791 the consideration? <br /> 1792 <br /> 1793 Cy Stober: Section 2.8.8.B of the Ordinance Page 2-28 or 84 of the whole ordinance states that the plain <br /> 1794 words action on the application shall be one of the following. 1)To recommend approval. 2)To <br /> 1795 recommend denial. 3)To recommend approval that was specific conditions. Or 4)To <br /> 1796 recommend the Planning Board be given extended time to consider the matter. And then on 289, <br /> 1797 the Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing after the Planning Board either <br /> 1798 makes its recommendation or takes no action on the application within 30 days of its referral. So <br /> 1799 that would be 30 days from tonight. <br /> 1800 <br /> 1801 Lamar Proctor: What,that the County commissioners have to hear it? <br /> 1802 <br /> 1803 Cy Stober: Shall hold a public hearing. <br /> 1804 <br /> 1805 Lamar Proctor: County commissioners? <br /> 1806 <br />