Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet - October 1 2025
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2025
>
PB Agenda Packet - October 1 2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2025 11:05:24 AM
Creation date
9/30/2025 11:03:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/1/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
36 <br /> 1643 and rights-of-way to be extended to the property lines, so those conversations can be had, and <br /> 1644 the applicant has responded to that staff guidance and conditions. <br /> 1645 <br /> 1646 Jonah Garson: Just very quickly. I understand and I've heard that there's a small HOA with an adjacent <br /> 1647 neighborhood, private property owners. What is, and this is informational,what is the extent of <br /> 1648 our mandate with regard to conversations with public schools, public entities? <br /> 1649 <br /> 1650 Cy Stober: None. They have a different elected board,and that board would need to take action,the OCS <br /> 1651 board to compel, and they need to make that commitment as part of a written document that'll be <br /> 1652 provided in the packet. None has been provided. <br /> 1653 <br /> 1654 Statler Gilfillen: However, if those organizations had talked before they made a presentation, say,this evening, <br /> 1655 and they presented an agreement between those organizations which impacts the final layout of <br /> 1656 the plans tonight, that could impact our decision, right? <br /> 1657 <br /> 1658 Cy Stober: Similar to the town providing a willing to serve letter for utilities, yes,that would be a factor you <br /> 1659 could consider. <br /> 1660 <br /> 1661 Statler Gilfillen: Thank you. <br /> 1662 <br /> 1663 Whitney Watson: So again, if you could,Taylor, if you could scroll,zoom out a little bit on the GIS map. I was <br /> 1664 wondering if you could speak to what the relative density for this new project would be like or <br /> 1665 similar to other developments in this part of Orange County. Is it going to be greater than what's <br /> 1666 represented by the property lines here or is it going to be less or about the same? Because that <br /> 1667 kind of gets to the rural character. <br /> 1668 <br /> 1669 Beth Trahos: Sure. So,you see quite a bit here of the Town of Hillsborough, and I don't know specifically the <br /> 1670 size of these lots within these neighborhoods. A third of an acre with a traditional platted <br /> 1671 subdivision, that's what these subdivisions are. <br /> 1672 <br /> 1673 Venkat Yendapalli: I think that subdivision is on sewer if I'm not wrong. Maybe planning team knows better. <br /> 1674 <br /> 1675 Cy Stober: Yes,those are all Town of Hillsborough. <br /> 1676 <br /> 1677 Beth Trahos: Sure. But so,these lot sizes would be larger. However,there would be open space that would be <br /> 1678 surrounding rather than just lotted out 20,000 square feet is roughly half an acre as compared to a <br /> 1679 third of an acre. That accommodates the septic that would be needed to serve these lots that are <br /> 1680 not getting service from the town. So, lots would be bigger than some of the lots you see,smaller <br /> 1681 than others that you see, but they would be surrounded by that common open space. <br /> 1682 <br /> 1683 Venkat Yendapalli: What's the minimum lot requirement as per UDO for this property? Haven't seen this. <br /> 1684 <br /> 1685 Beth Trahos: So,the AR zoning district anticipates 40,000 square foot lots, so roughly an acre lot. From a <br /> 1686 density perspective,this is less dense total number of units,total acreage,than could be built if it <br /> 1687 were traditionally platted. If it were traditionally platted,you would have to get way back into the <br /> 1688 subdivision and bring roads and it would impact the environmental features which we're trying to <br /> 1689 avoid doing. Smaller lots but larger open space. <br /> 1690 <br /> 1691 Cy Stober: Mr. Chair, I need to offer a correction. When I spoke to, to Mr.Yendapalli, I said that that was a <br /> 1692 subdivision in the Town of Hillsborough's jurisdiction. It is a patchwork of annexation that is the <br /> 1693 Highland Woods neighborhood, so some of those lots are annexed into the town, and some <br /> 1694 remain outside the town limits. <br /> 1695 <br /> 1696 Lamar Proctor: Thank you for that clarification. <br /> 1697 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.